>> >> I will observe that Alissa's term "random per-network" isn't in any of the >> possibilities >> below and the reasons given wouldn't apply if that term were used. Perhaps >> that >> could be used in a title? > > Nah. Too complex for a title, and "random" is a bad word - you should always > say pseudo-random or (more pedantic) uniformly distributed. > > IMHO the current title is clearest.
these addresses have the following properties: - stable per link - randomly generated as opposed to based on a MAC address. (making scanning attacks harder, makes tracking across links harder) - intended to replace existing EUI-64 identifiers truth in advertising; given that these addresses are meant to be used 'in public', what is "privacy enhanced" about them? the use of "privacy" confuses it with RFC4941 addresses, which these addresses do not replace. "Stable per-network Addresses for IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration (SPN-SLAAC)"? no hat, Ole -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
