Kontinuation commented on code in PR #14101:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14101#discussion_r2831349208
##########
api/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/expressions/Literal.java:
##########
@@ -71,6 +72,10 @@ static Literal<BigDecimal> of(BigDecimal value) {
return new Literals.DecimalLiteral(value);
}
+ static Literal<ByteBuffer> of(BoundingBox value) {
Review Comment:
Do you suggest that we hold `Literal<BoundingBox>` in the `literals` field
of `UnboundPredicate<ByteBuffer>` by violating the type signature of
`List<Literal<T>> literals`? I think we can still make it compile, but I just
want to make sure that it is the right way to do it.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
