On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Waldhoff, Rodney wrote:
> > I may be misreading this one, but why move into the DBCP bundle? This
> > seems like it would be a good example of what the sandbox is available
> > for, two similar implementations for a similar need. Any comments?
>
> The current DBCP depends upon JOCL, that's why I was going to move it in
> there. Is it OK to have a commons element depend upon a sandbox element?
>
Ok, I had misread that, disregard ;)
> > I am still going back through the proposal emails, hopefully I can
> > sit down and read them through shortly. This would get a definite +1,
> > especially with the inclusion of the Digester stuff.
>
> I suspect that JOCL will go away entirely when it is included with Digester,
> but I can move it into the sandbox. We can always delete it anyway.
>
> It's a fun little ContentHandler example, if nothing else.
>
> - Rod.
>
David
