On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Peter Donald wrote:
> At 08:54 2/4/01 -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> >I don't remember the vote count, (+1 from me if I didn't vote, but I think I
> >did). When 'official', this sounds like something for you to do. We can
> >help organize the directory layout, but I think Craig set a nice model with
> >the beanutils contribution.
>
> except for the name unixy name "share" rather than the plain commonsense
> name "java". Though I am curious - why isn't conf/ src/conf/ - the only
> conf file in there is modified during the build process so it makes sense
> to me to put it under src/conf or better yet src/manifest.
>
I inherited "share" as well (pre-Tomcat-3.0) so I'm not married to
it. But at least for beanutils there are two directories containing Java
sources -- "share" and "test". The "share" directory contains files that
end up in the shareable JAR file, while "test" contains only the JUnit
tests.
We can combine these into a single source directory (and use exclude rules
in the Ant scripts), or use names "java" and "test" -- i'm easy with any
approach.
> >I can help with that. I assume that we will adopt the standard Jakarta site
> >format to integrate with the rest of jakarta. We would need to do the main
> >commons site (someone is already working on that?), which I assume we model
> >after Taglibs.
> >
The rational place for the Cactus-specific stuff would be:
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/cactus
which translates to directory "/www/jakarta.apache.org/commons/cactus" on
the server.
> ><ob Velocity plug>
> > Stylebook is fine, although using Anakia from Jakarta Velocity is starting
> >to be used (Velocity, Cocoon, Turbine, and the Jakarta site itself, for
> >example)
>
> Cocoon - Are you sure ? ;)
>
> Anyway if you decide to go with stylebook I have the jakarta-style which I
> can move into jakarta-site CVS but I would recomend you use Anakia anyways
> (but then again me and xslt hate each other ;]).
>
I'm actually reasonably comfortable with XSLT, but Anakia would be OK too
(and preferable to stylebook IMHO). I'm also hoping someone else will
focus on the web site part of this :-).
> Cheers,
>
> Pete
>
Craig
