"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
>
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> > Vincent Massol :
> > > Do we also use the same bugzilla for all Commons subprojects ? Is it created
> > > yet ? Who is doing that ? :)
> >
> > We are already in bugzilla as a subproject. BeanUtils is there as a
> > component. So all we have to do is add Cactus when it makes the move.
> > I would be Craig could make the change :)
> >
>
> Yep ... ping me if I forget (or pound me if I didn't hear you the first
> time :-).
I just said that because I realize that I don't know how, nor do I
suspect I have the karma, so figured a little tickler like thi would do
it :)
> This does raise a policy question on Bugzilla, however. Bugzilla's
> hierarchy for categorizing bug reports is
> product/component/version. We've been using the subproject ("Commons") as
> the product, and I figured each Commons package would be a component. The
> question is, what do we do about version numbers (which are global to the
> entire Commons "product").
What do you mean, a 'global' version number?
Ah, if we construct a mega-jar of the current component releases? Good
question.
Can we avoid that? Just make sure each component is a separately
numbered release jar?
beanutils-1.0.jar
cactus-1.2.jar
etc?
> I guess we just enter any version number that's used by any package, and
> hope users are careful about how they report things -- just be aware that
> it's possible to enter invalid combinations.
I am not sure if relying on hope is good. Hm.
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Developing for the web? See http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
