Hi Sunish, About packaging jaledit and PICShell, I remember you talked about tha t. Now we've released a jallib-pack, with compiler included, could we move a step forward a build the "golden" pack you talk about ? I can give a try packaging a standalone win binary for PICShell (and I'll contact author Olivier).
Cheers ! Seb 2009/1/3 Sunish Issac <[email protected]> > I too felt that Bert is against an initiative like jallib, which I had > discussed before. Having a full pack with jallib, jaledit and PIC shell with > an installable setup program for win32 will definitely make Bert Pack > useless. > > Sunish > > On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Sebastien Lelong < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> But it does have things we don't have yet: >>> - random routine >>> - more delays >> >> >> I agree to add them :) BTW, careful with Bert's libs: there are >> explicitely not compatible with commercial purpose (or books). This means >> they can't be added to jallib with a ZLIB license. >> >> There's also pic_program_eeprom.jal. I can remember discussion between Rob >> and Eur, about merging this into pic_data_eeprom (or the like). I don't know >> where it is now. Maybe we could re-open the discussion). >> >> About random.jal. dice() procedure seems to be bugged: it returns a randum >> number between 1 and 6, but "explore" other number (see while loop... end >> loop). Not all numbers between 1 and 6 has the probability to be chosen. >> >> >> Seb >> -- >> Sébastien Lelong >> http://www.sirloon.net >> http://sirbot.org >> >> >> > > > > -- Sébastien Lelong http://www.sirloon.net http://sirbot.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
