Hi William, You're right and that's why I asked Rob how much he did test. My point is letting more time while nobody is able to test (as for me, I can't) is also useless. About tracking TORELEASE you can use SVN with a date parameter instead of a revision number. Cheers Seb Le 4 juil. 2011 14:56, "William" <[email protected]> a écrit : > Greetings, > > On Jul 4, 12:41 am, Sebastien Lelong <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> I'm not sure, we've been waiting so much, but and the other side you're >> right we should wait some more due to recent changes. But... this waiting >> period is about testing, if no one is able to test, it's a waste of time. > > Agreed, but then again, what is the point of 'releasing' untested > code, since we already have the 'bee' snapshots? > > Rob says he's comfortable with his changes, so that is good enough for > me. > > Do we have an existing tool to see which (if any) other files in > TORELEASE may have changed since your beta? I don't think there are > any other updates but I am not sure. > > William > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en. >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
