Susan, I think you've gotten hold of the wrong end of the stick. I don't even remember what you said about Reagan, HIV and Alzheimers. I remember the thread, but I wasn't reading the posts. So if I have seemed to be joking about things you said, it is 100 per cent cooincidence. I'm sorry if that seems unlikely, but I promise you it is. I'm sorry you felt excluded, picked on or sniggered at - that was definitely not the intention. Please accept my apology for making you feel that way.

Sarah


At 10:01 PM -0800 02/10/2003, Susan Guzzi wrote:
Sarah,

I said "I" didn't think you were "that" conservative. Sometimes when one finds strength in
numbers as there are a few more conservative types around then there used to be, they tend to
huddle. Awhile back I tried to assert a common ground with you on atheism, if you recall, so I
have not been closed-minded towards your personal convictions or because of them.

I had an exchange with Bree last weekend on Regan/HIV/ Alzheimers. In the post I stated my
opinion of all the links and articles brandished about in an effort to prove a point or misprove
anothers. I said that these articles were opinion laced and slanted. Now every post you and
Kasey put up this week made snide reference to my comments, often using my exact words. Yet when
the journalism thread came up - you both souded a lot like me. If we were friends here, as Kakki
claims we are, you could have included me and teased me, but instead you treated me like I was
OBTUSE. Please, I am a street wise punk of a 45 year old, it's not getting by me. At least one of
you if not both knew how catty you were being. I really just wanted to ignore but I am a bit of
an emotional sort.

Reply via email to