The thing I don't like about jQuery's docs are that there are lots of things left out. I suppose it's assumptions made, but common, important things aren't mentioned.
_____ From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dragan Krstic Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 9:18 AM To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com Subject: [jQuery] Re: Do you think jQuery's documentation is enought? 2007/8/2, Alexandre Plennevaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Have you actually tried to read mootools documentation? It's very technical IMHO. Yes, I did, but it cannot provide kick start as jQuery documentation. I have feeling mootool docs is oriented only to experienced users. Jquery documentation 's layout may not be the sexiest, but it performs quite well in terms on how it is structured, written and how helpful and concise. Yes, in terms of docs too, less is sometimes more. I do wish it was more like php 's online docs, with (moderated) users feedback, tip and tricks for each function. Me too. Even offline version is sufficient for great range of tasks. Cheers, alex -----Original Message----- From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery-en@googlegroups.com ] On Behalf Of fatihturan Sent: jeudi 2 août 2007 10:18 To: jQuery (English) Subject: [jQuery] Do you think jQuery's documentation is enought? What do you think about this question? Do you think jQuery's documentation is enought? Personally i think jQuery's documentation isn't enought. So i'm looking to <a href="http://docs.mootools.net/";>MooTools documentation</a> and <a href=" http://demos.mootools.net/";>demos</a> then i'm looking to <a href="http://docs.jquery.com/";>jQuery's documentation</a> (dude where is demos? xD) comparing both documentations and thinking jQuery's documentation isn't enought. However, i want to know what do you think about this situation... Ce message Envoi est certifié sans virus connu. Analyse effectuée par AVG. Version: 7.5.476 / Base de données virus: 269.11.0/929 - Date: 31/07/2007 17:26 -- Dragan Krstić krdr http://krdr.ebloggy.com/
