To add to Richard's list * Ability to post code without having Google Groups code f_ck it up*
I'm not sure why people are "voting" and all that, it's done, it's decided, it's time to get with the program Besides, as Richard pointed out, the mailing list right here will still exist, it just won't be moderated/managed by the people it was before...... and Karl put it best: they can't please everyone..... there's a LOT of topics from over the past two years on this very mailing list crying out for a forum instead of the mailing list..... Damned if you do.... damned if you don't On Jan 22, 11:31 am, "Richard D. Worth" <rdwo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Octavian Rasnita <orasn...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > > From: "Karl Swedberg" <k...@englishrules.com> > > >> On Jan 21, 2010, at 8:11 PM, brian wrote: > > >> FWIW, I'm pretty sure the decision to drop Google Groups is due to > >>> John Ressig's account being spoofed by spammers. > > >> No, that's not it. Okay, maybe it was one of the last straws, but > >> we've been talking about moving to a forum for a couple years now. If > >> you want to know what factors were involved in the decision, please read > >>http://jquery14.com/day-07/new-jquery-forum/ > > > I read that: > > > "Additionally, we wanted something that lowered the barrier to asking a > > question - something that anyone would be able to use" > > > Well, for some categories of users, the movement to a forum has done > > exactly the reverse, because a forum is much less accessible than a mailing > > list for screen reader users for example, but for other categories of users > > also. > > > For example, if a user uses a good mail client, he or she could configure > > it so all the messages from the list to go to a specific folder, the > > messages that contain some words in the subjects or in the body to go to > > another special folder as they arrive, the messages are automaticly grouped > > by conversation, and they can easier be all saved locally or all deleted (or > > individually). > > And if a user has a good rss reader they can do the same with a forum. Also, > using rss2email services, they could have the best of both worlds. > > > > > The best solution from the perspective of the users would be to have a > > mailing list system that can also offer and present the messages on the web, > > but this would involve more work for JQuery developers, and it seems that > > this idea is the best, but there is nobody willing to help doing and > > administering it. > > > So the JQuery developers have chosen to use a forum which is administered > > by somebody else. That's very OK, but I think at least the JQuery mailing > > lists should not be disabled, while there still are users that prefer using > > them. > > I don't know that they will be disabled, but if not they will be completely > unmoderated. This means way more spam than before. In addition, many active > contributors, including jQuery team members, have moved over to the forum, > so there will be a lot less traffic on the mailing lists. People may still > find help and answers, but it won't be the official forum. Just as before > when the mailing list was the official forum, people found answers > elsewhere. > > > > > To be honest, I've never been a fan of forums, either. But after > >> spending some time in the jQuery forum, I'm starting to appreciate its > >> advantages over a plain mailing list. > > > Can you please tell us which are those advantages? > > (in general, not only regarding JQuery forum.) > > *Tags* > I tag and filter emails, and it's been really nice. But it's always bothered > me that all the tagging and filtering I do has to be duplicated by everyone > else consuming the same content. Using tags on the website forum, all this > metadata can be shared. > > *Types* > On the forum, there are 5 type of threads: Discussions, Questions, Ideas, > Problems, and Announcements. These can be selected by the OP and corrected > be a moderator, and searched and filtered on. Another piece of shared > metadata. > > *Categories* > Before we had 5 or 6 mailing lists for different sub-topics. Many times a > day as a moderator, I would have to kindly ask someone to move a discussion > to the correct forum, to keep noise down, to keep the list on-topic, and to > ensure people saw the question and the answer in the right place, whether > via email or web archive. This was not only a real pain, but it's not that > much fun for anyone involved, especially new users that may not have a clue > that there's more than one list, or which list to post to: jquery-en, > jquery-dev, jquery-ui, jquery-ui-dev, jquery-a11y, etc. On the new website > forum, not only is it easier to see which top-level forum topics are > available for posting, but if something is posted in the wrong forum, a > moderator can simply select 'Move this topic' and then select the correct > sub-forum. That immediately reflects in any sorting, filtering, or > categorization anyone does. Another piece of shared metadata. > > *Status* > In addition to being able to tag, type, and categorize each thread, a > moderator and/or the OP can set the status of a thread. The OP can select an > answer as the best, meaning future visitors can read 2 messages instead of > 20. Moderators can set the status as 'more info needed', closed, answered, > open, in-progress, etc. All these statuses can be used in sorting and > filtering. Another piece of shared metadata. > > Noticing a trend? > > *Moderation edit controls* > Posts can be edited. This isn't possible with email, since the message was > already sent. And the web archive stores only the original message. This > needs to be used judiciously, but can be great for fixing typographical > errors, adding some important keywords to a thread topic, fixing some > formatting, etc. > > *Permalinks* > Have you ever tried to email someone a google groups mailing list thread? Or > post it to a webpage, or another thread? Yuck. Here's how it goes, more or > less: > 1. grab the title of the thread > 2. open up the google groups web interface (don't forget to open the right > mailing list, there are 5-6 for jQuery) > 3. search for the title of the thread > 4. ???? > 5. hope you got lucky in step 4 and it actually showed up. Many many don't. > Or sometimes you have to be creative with your search terms > 6. click on the link > 7. fuss with the url so it looks something like > thishttp://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/de2f89e... > instead of like > thishttp://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/de2f89e... > 8. Lament that your url contains only a GUID and no words from the post > title > (Note that it needn't be this complicated, as all mailing list threads and > posts have unique identifiers. So this complaint is more specific to the > google groups web interface than mailing lists in general. Many mailing > lists have a permalink in the post itself) > > With the web-based forum, while on the thread you want to email or link to > 1. Click 'Permalink'http://forum.jquery.com/topic/boxy-hide-parent-22-1-2010 > > I'm right there with Karl. In fact we were together last week and both > commented that we weren't thrilled about giving up the mailing list and > switching to the forum. And he and I are among the top posters. I was always > really happy with the mailing list, and pleased with the flexibility it > offered in terms of mail clients. Every user was in complete control of > their experience, and could combine it with experiences they had with other > mailing lists. I wasn't anxious to give that up for a forum, especially if > it wasn't going to send emails, and let me respond via email. But I'm coming > around. > > One of the compromises of a web-based forum is that the client (the web > browser) you choose is not as significant as the tools provided by the forum > itself. The website is basically the client for that back-end server data. > And as an end-user, you can only control that inasmuch as you get involved > and provide feedback on what features are important to you. Also, if it's a > good one, with web services such as RSS, APIs, advanced search, RESTful > urls, you could make your own clients, web browser/site or otherwise. > > - Richard
