I believe that JSP Team's idea is to find better tags than <INCLUDEIF> and <LOOP> for 1.0, not to eliminate its functionality .- Think that both were questioned in this list, with good reasons, I guess.- Shouldn't we propose cleaner tag oriented alternatives as James Klicman did for the ProcessRequest thread? Personaly I don't like the <LOOP> sintax, I would like something related to Enumerations or Iterators, not only indexed properties.- Walter Jerusalinsky =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff JSP-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
- The horror of moving from 0.92 to 1.0 Chris Fesler
- Re: The horror of moving from 0.92 to 1.0 Dave Ferguson
- Re: The horror of moving from 0.92 to 1.0 Tom Hume
- Re: The horror of moving from 0.92 to 1.0 Scott Ferguson
- Re: The horror of moving from 0.92 to 1.0 Kirkdorffer, Daniel
- Re: The horror of moving from 0.92 to 1.0 Chris Fesler
- Re: The horror of moving from 0.92 to 1.0 TK Sung
- Re: The horror of moving from 0.92 to 1.0 Richard Mazzaferri
- Re: The horror of moving from 0.92 to 1.0 Nic Wise
- Re: The horror of moving from 0.92 to 1.0 Walter Jerusalinsky
- Re: The horror of moving from 0.92 to 1.0 TK Sung
- Re: The horror of moving from 0.92 to 1.0 Drew Cox
- Re: The horror of moving from 0.92 to 1.0 Mutsaers, Peter
- Re: The horror of moving from 0.92 to 1.0 Richard Dallaway
- Re: The horror of moving from 0.92 to 1.0 Eric Lunt
- Re: The horror of moving from 0.92 to 1.0 Joe Wilson
- Re: The horror of moving from 0.92 to 1.0 Mark A. Kolb
- Re: The horror of moving from 0.92 to 1.0 Brad Neuberg
- Re: The horror of moving from 0.92 to 1.0 Mike McElligott
- Re: The horror of moving from 0.92 to 1.0 Kirkdorffer, Daniel
