I followed this thread closely. Although I haven't done real personal testing, I hope I may leave some comments.
I agree with Lindsay that users should be allowed more control *not by default*. That would mean, having an 'advanced' tab that includes both Whitelist and Blacklist options. Even if Baloo is blazing fast, some users (like me) would appreciate options to disabled certain path to be indexed (even without any performance gain). Some people can actually do customizing for the sake of customizing? About the folder name/full path, I propose a 'detailed' view option that can show full path. (Folder name - folder path - date added/removed from black/whitelist) I hope my comments is helpful. Please forgive me and discard it otherwise, I might have no ground to post any comment (I'm self learning to code just that I can contribute to KDE someday). On Mar 31, 2014 5:13 AM, "Thomas Lübking" <thomas.luebk...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sonntag, 30. März 2014 23:46:01 CEST, Pablo Sanchez wrote: > >> [ Comments below, in-line ] >> >> On 03/30/2014 05:43 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: >> >>> I did that twice today already. I am sorry i failed your reading test. >>> Will >>> refrain for further commenting in this thread. >>> >> >> I don't think you should get offended because perhaps there was a >> translation issue but your comments were a bit `barbed' ... >> > > I don't mind being addressed barbed - as long as there's sth. to address. > > Sum up: > Vishesh apparently felt insulted, because he thought Lindsay would have > implied that he could not do it right and I pointed out that to me Lindsay > clearly meant that he (or anybody) could not know what is "right" to the > user in this regard and it's also about giving the user the idea of control > (because, frankly, w/o reading the code you're in nothing like that). > She confirmed and stressed that this was not questioning Vishesh's skills, > Vishesh accepted - item done. > > When, in the context of his mass reply, Albert picked a line from my > "translation" and asked me about the presence of a feature on that, i was > frankly under the impression that he was merely reacting on keywords and > not following the line of a discussion that also finished some hours ago. > > > Cheers, > Thomas > > Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to >>> unsubscribe << >>> >>
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
