** Reply to message from Ralph Shumaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 16 May 2008 00:19:48 -0700
> Obviously. But ½" is ridiculously large. I think ⅛" (or maybe half that) > would be plenty. At that size, it would be rather obvious that the > scrollbar has reached it's minimum. Even if it is not that obvious, it > would still be *far* more obvious than ½"! regardless, there should be some kind of indication that the standard way of visualizing the control has changed. And not everyone has the same dexterity so ⅛" can be too small for some. I think the original complaint was that it was not understood that the paging and scroller size no longer matched one:one. A visual clue would solve that without any other changes to the system. Doug -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
