Aanhalen Nicolas Riendeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

>  > > The 9.x versions of Bind don't really like compiling on a glibc as
> old as
>  > > that used for LEAF, or I would have done this already...
>  > >
>  > > Charles Steinkuehler
>  > > http://lrp.steinkuehler.net
>  > > http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror)
>  >
>  >
>  > Same problem with 3.x series of the Roaring Penguin PPPoE client
> 
> I had it running (3.3) on ES2B before a very unfortunate hd crash
> (too much current variation thank to our power utility company...).
> 
> There was a "trick" however... I had replaced the glibc 2.0 libraries
> with glibc 2.1.3... I haven't yet "updated/migrated" my current
> Dachstein
> installation to glibc 2.1.3 because I'm still experiencing some
> problems
> (see my message concerning gzip/gunzip) with it but once this get's
> resolved
> I'll switch back to 2.1.3...


Would any of the people who already tried (and preferably succeeded)
upgraded to glibc 2.1.3 give a little bit more explanation at how it is done?
I am running a dual floppy eigerstein for the moment and would like a shot.

Is it just a matter of replacing some binaries and maybe some symbolic links?
If so which binaries and which links would that be?
Or is there more to it than that? Does the kernel version or something in 
kernel configuration has something to do with it?

I already noticed there is a dachstein cd iso with glibc 2.1.3 support, if it 
is just a matter of replacing binaries could I just copy those from this iso 
image?

Thanks in Advance

Kim Oppalfens
> 
> I'm running it off a write-protected SCSI hd but this would also be
> possible
> for DCD (Dachstein CD). The main problem I can see with migrating a
> Dachstein or
> any other distribution to glibc 2.1.3 (or newer) would be that it would
> no
> longer be able to make it fit on a diskette and that this would
> introduce
> minimum glibc version requirements for lrp packages...
> 
> Have a nice day!
> 
> Nick
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leaf-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
> 
> 


-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through Tiscalinet Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be)

_______________________________________________
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user

Reply via email to