At 16:45 20/01/2002, Nicolas Riendeau wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comments inline >>Would any of the people who already tried (and preferably succeeded) >>upgraded to glibc 2.1.3 give a little bit more explanation at how it is done? >>I am running a dual floppy eigerstein for the moment and would like a shot. > > >I'm not sure if this is still a "requirement" with Dachstein but with ES2B the > >libraries apperently had to be stored in root.lrp (it would crash otherwise, I >guess it needs it before loading the rest...). > >I too had a dual floppy installation (still have, just in case...) and I'm not >sure if it would have fit but I must confess that in my case my floppy were >formatted as 1.44 Mb and not as 1.68 Mb (I personnally don't trust 1.68...). > > >>Is it just a matter of replacing some binaries and maybe some symbolic links? >>If so which binaries and which links would that be? > > >According to the following URL >http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/FAQ.html#s-2.27 >most of what has been compiled for glibc 2.0 should work with glibc 2.1 so >I hadn't recompiled any of the programs... Indeed most of the programs provided they are compiled for glibc 2.0 which means that in order to get some apps working you (or someone else) need to recompile them. ><WARNING THIS IS PROBABLY THE "COW BOY" WAY OF DOING THINGS AND IF YOU TRY >IT YOU'RE >DOING IT AT YOUR OWN RISKS AND I WOULD SUGGEST YOU DO A BACKUP OF YOUR DISKS.> Noted :-) >That said, mostly what I had done was take the libc.lrp package from an >Oxygen image, added >it to SYSLINUX.CFG and rebooted. Most of the links where taken card of by >that operation... > >I don't remember if I had that problem but it would seem that with >Dachstein the >following links would still point to glibc 2.0 librairies after that >operation... > >libnss_dns.so.1 >libnss_files.so.1.... >libnsl.so.1 > >which on a full (Redhat-based) distribution point respectivly to: > >libnss1_dns-2.1.3.so >libnss1_files-2.1.3.so >libnsl-2.1.3.so > >which I would be tempted to copy from that full distribution... Anybody >know what they're >used for and whether it would be a good idea to copy them over from a >"full distribution"? > >BTW, don't forget to delete the old glibc libraries before backing up... > > >>Or is there more to it than that? Does the kernel version or something in >>kernel configuration has something to do with it? > > >If there is would somebody please tell us... >Yes please do >>I already noticed there is a dachstein cd iso with glibc 2.1.3 support, >>if it is just a matter of replacing binaries could I just copy those from >>this iso image? > >I think you're talking of David Douthitt's Oxygen here... AFAIK, DCD >(Dachstein CD) >as distributed by Charles Steinkuehler uses glibc 2.0... Does somebody >distributes >an ISO image based on Dachstein which uses glibc 2.1.3? Yups on http://leaf.sourceforge.net somebody is distributing an image as "proof-of-concept" >BTW, everything seemed to work ok after I had replaced the librairies but >ONCE AGAIN, IF YOU TRY THIS YOU'RE DOING IT AT YOUR OWN RISKS... >While I have many years of experience in the computer field I'm still >quite a newbie when it comes to Linux and the modifications I had made >where at my >own risk & done in in a trial-error way... (sp?) Standard disclaimer detected ;-) >BTW, if anybody know of anything I've done wrong or that I forgot to do, >please do not >hesitate to post... > >Have a nice day! > >Nick > >PS: Please forgive my English as it's not my mother tongue. Thanks! çava, Je l'ai compris assez bien :-) "There is no such thing as gravity, the world just sucks" _______________________________________________ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
