> > You know that for a fact do you? Since when has facts been an issue with you?
> > Armchair management I can deal with, armchair administration > I find hard to > swallow. Unless you're the one doing the armchair administrating, of course. > > I do not possess all the facts, nor do you or anyone else on > this list. > Some on the list know more than others but the overriding > fact is this. Ah - here come those 'facts' again. > > The administrators job was to know all the facts and then > choose the best > buyer for everyone concerned, that includes the creditors. Are you sure that is a fact? If the administrators had the power to 'choose' the best buyer then why was there a vote on it? > > So, not only are you saying that Bates is a crook, Surely even Bates would admit to that. > inventing > debt etc etc, > you are saying Astor are crooks Guilty by association IMHO > (because they were only > interested in Bates > offer) Aren't you the slightest bit suspicious as to why this might be? As one who perpetuates the 'property developer' theory about all the other bids why does the effective writing off of £18M for apparently no return not bother you? > and KPMG are either crooks or grossly negligent in > their duties. It is a stated fact by one of LUAFC Ltd's creditors that details of the alternative bidders were not received until it was too late to have affected his proxied vote. One can only assume that this applied to other creditors who were eligible to vote. As the difference on the Friday equated to 3 or 4 20 year ST holders it is easy to see how outcomes could be manipulated without anyone actually being 'crooks'. > > I tell you what, if I were any of those parties I would have > your arse down > the courts for libel before you could shuffle on it and come > up with any > more armchair administration. Bring it on - bet Simon Morris is dead chuffed about the aspersions you seem happy to cast about him. > Bates played the game to get what he wanted. No more or less > than anyone > else who wanted to buy the club. If he or Astor or KPMG > broke the law (and > by inventing debt or having conflicts of interest or turning > blind eyes that > would be breaking the law) then the relevant authorities will > find out. Only if they investigate it, as has now been requested by my local MP! > Fuck me, we are out of admin, still have a club, There you go again with this 'we' - Ken Bates has the shell of a once great club. > are getting a squad > together for preseason, Are we - is that another of your unsubstantiated facts? If not, who's fault is it we are not buying or selling anyone? > why are you lot still moaning and > whingeing about > Bates being a naughty boy? So if Kim Jong-Il/Robert Mugabe/Than Shwe was running the club that would be ok by you as long as we got a decent pre-season? Cheers Paul _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
