Dede Holden wrote
Based on what Geoff and Dave B have said, I think my source and details
were pretty clear cut - no conflicts so everything combined like it was
supposed to.
If you did indeed do exactly what you described in your original post,
you merged the *new* Source into the *old* one. This does retain the
old Source Detail. Presumably what you intended to do is the opposite -
old into new - and everyone is finding that Source Details are *not*
retained in the new, merged Source.
Has your newly combined Source got the bullet next to it when you look
at the Source List? If not, then you definitely merged new into old.
--
Jenny M Benson
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
