Elizabeth: Agreed on both counts. The first pass through _EE_ can leave you dizzy just from the sheer number of variables, and Legacy's source templates are designed to try and accommodate all of those. I think where we sometimes go wrong is in trying to fill in *all* the template fields and forgetting that not every field is applicable to every situation. As you've said several times before, it finally boils down to a matter of common sense.
Kirsten -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Elizabeth Richardson Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 11:05 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Master Source Subsequent Citation Issue Thanks, Kirsten. Subsequent posts from ESM herself have been very enlightening! It would seem that misinterpretation and confusion abound. Elizabeth researching the descendants of William and Sarah (Patterson) Thompson ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kirsten Bowman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com> Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 9:49 AM Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Master Source Subsequent Citation Issue > Elizabeth: > > I believe that discussion was based on a misinterpretation. I do have > _EE_ > and it's pretty clear on citation of published books. In fact, I believe > I > responded to that thread, but the discussion (and misinterpretation) > continued. > > Kirsten *** Holiday discounts on Legacy 7.0, add-ons, books, and more. Visit http://tinyurl.com/65rpbt. *** Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
