On Mon, 5 May 2014 10:06:45 -0700 (PDT) duf...@gmail.com wrote: > Thanks for the explanation, Terry. > I think the solution lies in the middle ground that you propose, and > which I was already looking forward to. But I thought it was going to > be implemented months ago! Things seem to have stalled, after an > initial flurry of activity (videocasts, etc) in the right direction.
Yes, it has definitely stalled, rather than been completed and failing to be what you were hoping for. I'm very busy these days... maybe next month it won't be so bad, maybe. Cheers -Terry > Leo's settings can by all means remain exactly as they are, with no > problem whatsoever, provided that there is also a more user friendly > way of accessing them, so that the same settings can be accessed in a > more "humanly readable" way. > As things stand today, the situation a bit too intricate, and what > the new user experiences is a feeling of confusion. Complexity tends > to be overwhelming and to put off people. Also, why complexity, when > things could be simplified with no loss? > Hiding at least part of the complexity "under the hood" could be a > major improvement, I believe. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
