On Jan 13, 2012, at 11:09 AM, Nathan Coulson wrote: > If we do support it, I would also like an option for initramless setups as > well.
To what end? I don't mean to be argumentative, but I really don't see why
people see a non-initramfs boot as an important or useful goal. What
features/benefits does it provide, other than you don't have to run cpio one
time when building your system?
Zach
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
