I assume that if you're using LFS to build an embedded system (I did that a long time ago), you want to reduce boot times.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 19:17, Zachary Kotlarek <z...@kotlarek.com> wrote: > > On Jan 13, 2012, at 11:09 AM, Nathan Coulson wrote: > >> If we do support it, I would also like an option for initramless setups as >> well. > > > To what end? I don't mean to be argumentative, but I really don't see why > people see a non-initramfs boot as an important or useful goal. What > features/benefits does it provide, other than you don't have to run cpio one > time when building your system? > > Zach > > > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > -- Kevin Lyda Dublin, Ireland US Citizen overseas? We can vote. Register now: http://www.votefromabroad.org/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
