On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 13:19:50 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Sometimes in politics, you vote for a guy/gal who will take away some > >> freedom because the only viable alternative is going to take away even > more. > > >> Lowell C. Savage > > >Once again that analogy does not work, because doing nothing in terms > >of voting does not make things worse than voting for a candidate that > >is bad. > > >Travis > > How'd'ya figure? Like you can prevent the election from being held, or the > office from being filled?
No. You can not stop the election from being held or the office from being filled. But voting for one candidate or the other does not help you in anyway. You vote is not going to change the outcome, nor is the outcome really crucial. By not voting you are sending a stronger (although still weak) message for what is right than a vote for either of the bad candidates. Travis _______________________________________________ Libnw mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] List info and subscriber options: http://immosys.com/mailman/listinfo/libnw Archives: http://immosys.com/mailman//pipermail/libnw
