"Lowell C. Savage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > I'm afraid I'll have to take issue with you on a couple of points.
Please, by all means... Public debate is all I'm seeking... >First, I suspect that you are making a lot more out of Cheney's remarks >that they > deserve. It was certainly a poor choice of words, I'm currently smiling because our Honerable Vice President, Mr.Cheney, was being completely honest in his answer. The Bush Administration is interested in "controlled democratic elections" both at home and abroad. <At the present time I'll forego any rebuttal on the issue of political reform and whatever communications mediums would best serve the American electorate. I'd be a very happy voter if 'the people' became interested in resolving the issue of "corrupt elections" in America...> And yes, It's of my opinion that individuals or entities who participate in or, support the corruption of our most sacred right, our right to vote, may be committing an act of treason whether punishable or not. > As for the "problem" of third-parties getting any traction, that's > something > that goes with the territory. Partisanship? Should I assume that all candidates running in non-partisan elections have and receive equal treatment from "corporate owned media"? What about state or local issues that appear on the ballot? Fact: A few years ago the State of Washington sold an entire "special election" to billionaire Paul Allen... It would appear as if 'the people' have no voice when the "corporate controlled media" only broadcast(s) sound bites from one side of any given issue. Steven Thompson Ford, WA _______________________________________________ Libnw mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] List info and subscriber options: http://immosys.com/mailman/listinfo/libnw Archives: http://immosys.com/mailman//pipermail/libnw
