Travis Pahl wrote: > They are jews in the middle east where they used to live. If whatever > the hell native tribe it was that sold manhattan for a few trinkets > were to come back and take manhattan, do you think there might be just > a tad bit of anger torwards those indians? That is similar to what > you have with the jews in isreal. Whether the details make it 'legal' > or not, the people in the region are not ahppy about it to say the > least.
> In other words you are being extremely dishonest trying to simplify it > to them simply being jews as the only reason they are attacked. Are they attacking Arabs over land disputes in Israel? Do they even THINK of it as an individual property matter? No, they just don't want Jews living among them. _______________________________________________ Libnw mailing list Libnw@immosys.com List info and subscriber options: http://immosys.com/mailman/listinfo/libnw Archives: http://immosys.com/mailman//pipermail/libnw
