Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 22:30:39 +0700 From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [LIB] "Hardware" hibernation in L110
> The critical thing being though (I suspect) that you were stomping them > when the system was running, rather than pausing it mid-operation, > stomping them, and completing the operation. > > Enquiring minds want to know... You're dead right. I'm not thinking there could never be a glitch - just that my hunch is it would never be terminal, and that as it would be restricted to IE, cookies, history, and other temporary Internet files, nothing would be lost that's of any value to me. I suspect that the worst that would happen would be that you'd have to shut down IE (or it would crash) and you'd loose whatever you were looking at / working on; and only in the event of a hardware hibernate, not a Win'2K hibernate. But at the end of the day, it's just a guess! The other possibilty would be to persuade Win'2K to hibernate in the same space as the BIOS - but that would not actually have any benefit unless your drive was so full it couldn't otherwise have hibernated; the reserved space would still be wasted when the system was up and running. ************************************************************** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://www.silverace.com/libretto/ - Archives -------TO UNSUBSCRIBE------- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe --------TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST------ Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest **************************************************************
