Please see https://github.com/jamesob/delving-bitcoin-archive, which anyone can run an instance of themselves.
On December 4, 2023 3:48:59 PM EST, Peter Todd <p...@petertodd.org> wrote: >On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 12:35:32PM -0800, Matt Corallo wrote: >> Ah, there was also some concern over archiving of a discourse, which we'd >> hoped was trivial through "mailing list mode", but apparently that may not >> be the case. Further thoughts on that are welcome. > >You mean archiving of discourse on delvingbitcoin.org? > >I think that's a serious problem if there's no good way to mirror >delvingbitcoin.org. It is very easy to archive email lists, and anyone can do >it (I'm archiving lightning-dev, bitcoin-dev myself, among others). Also, email >list archives naturally lead themselves to decent authentication, both via PGP >and more commonly, DMIK, making archives authenticatable. I don't see any way >that delvingbitcoin.org could ever replicate that beyond mere timestamps. > >I'll be the first to say that timestamping is pretty weak security. Better than >nothing. But they aren't good. > >-- >https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
_______________________________________________ Lightning-dev mailing list Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
