On Mon Dec 4, 2023 at 9:32 PM CET, Matt Corallo wrote: > On the call the vote was split between "host our own ML, or maybe use > groups.io" and "some discourse > instance, probably delvingbitcoin.org", with a weak majority for the second. > > With that in mind, we're gonna give delvingbitcoin.org a try, at least for > two weeks, and then we > can come back to this and discuss!
I guess that we are going to use https://delvingbitcoin.org for the first part of the 2024 and then revisit it if needed, right? Cheers, Vincent. > > Some folks indicated they'd like to interact with it via the supposed > "mailing list mode", but sadly > AJ indicated it may not be super reliable (and seems to be disabled on > delvingbitcoin.org). I've > asked AJ to enable it so people can maybe try it out but we'll see if it > works. Sadly if you don't > enable this mode it appears you cannot post via email. > > See-also discussion of using a category vs tags at > https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/can-we-get-a-lightning-protocol-design-category-wg/242/3 > > Because this is new, we'll have another discussion in two weeks about if > people are happy with this > as a solution/if we should host our own discourse (not sure why)/if we should > go back to the mailing > list plan. Those who have a view can also respond to this email and I'll > raise it in the meeting. > > Matt > > On 11/26/23 8:51 AM, Matt Corallo wrote: > > During the last meeting it came up that the mailing list here will likely > > shut down somewhere around > > the end of the year. We listed basically the following options for future > > discussion forums: > > > > * google groups as a mailing list hoster. One question was whether its > > friendly to subscribing > > without a gmail account, which may be limiting to some. > > * github discussions on the lightning org. One question is whether the > > moderation tools here are > > sufficient. > > * Someone (probably me) host a mailman instance and we use another mailing > > list. I dug into this a > > bit and am happy to do this, on the one condition that the ML remains fully > > moderated, though this > > doens't seem like a substantial burden today. One question is if > > spam-foldering will be an issue, > > but with full moderation I'm pretty confident this will be tolerable, at > > least for those with email > > hosted anywhere but Microsoft lol. > > * A discourse instance (either we host one or we use delvingbitcoin, which > > AJ hosts and has > > previously offered to set up a lightning section on). > > > > There was some loose discussion, but I'm not sure there's going to be a > > clear conclusion. Thus, I > > think we should simply vote at the next meeting after a time-boxed minute > > or two discussion. If > > anyone has any thoughts or would like to have their voice heard, they can > > join the meeting in a week > > and a day or can respond here and I'll do my best to repeat the views > > expressed on the call. > > > > Matt > > _______________________________________________ > > Lightning-dev mailing list > > Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev > _______________________________________________ > Lightning-dev mailing list > Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev _______________________________________________ Lightning-dev mailing list Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
