Hi David,
> Have you even tried it?
Prior to v2.17, I used a function which, to my memory, is identical to the one
you've posted. There were bugs with it (specifically with \transpose or
\relative — I never hunted down the exact problem). This function that I've
posted works perfectly for me now, and has for the past several versions of
Lilypond, without the intermittent problems I had with that other function.
I have far too much work composing and engraving right now (~18 months of
classical and music theatre commissions) to spend time testing your function.
However, if you'd like to exhaustively test the two versions with multiple
\transpose and \relative commands, etc., and get back to me with a whitepaper
on the results, I would be happy to look it over.
In the meantime, my function — as I've said — works perfectly for me. And since
it isn't broken, I have no inspiration to [potentially] fix it right now.
Thanks again,Kieren.
> From: d...@gnu.org
> To: kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca
> CC: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: divisi parts and another general question
> Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2013 00:27:19 +0100
>
> Kieren MacMillan <kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> writes:
>
> > Because I've found that your function (which I used to use) and mine
> > (which someone else wrote for me) do two different things — and I want
> > the one that yours doesn’t do.
> >
> > Thanks anyway,
> > Kieren.
>
> Kieren, I translated your function right now pretty much literally from
> the Scheme expression back to using an embedded LilyPond expression, so
> it is quite unlikely that it does something different.
>
> Have you even tried it?
>
> --
> David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
