Kieren MacMillan <kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> writes: > Hi David, > >> Have you even tried it? > > Prior to v2.17, I used a function which, to my memory, is identical to > the one you've posted. There were bugs with it (specifically with > \transpose or \relative — I never hunted down the exact problem).
That makes me doubt your memory. > I have far too much work composing and engraving right now (~18 months > of classical and music theatre commissions) to spend time testing your > function. That is no problem as long as you don't promote rather opaque code to others without good reason. > However, if you'd like to exhaustively test the two versions with > multiple \transpose and \relative commands, etc., and get back to me > with a whitepaper on the results, I would be happy to look it over. There is little point for me to test identical music expressions for identical results. I have to admit _one_ difference: I've drawn \oneVoice into a more logical place. You can move it back to the end of the function if you want to but I don't see that making a difference in the typeset results. Other than that, the function will produce exactly the same music expression after this change, just written in a different manner. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
