Hi David, > Here is one difference: #{ ... #} creates copies of music identifiers > referenced via \... inside. > > That's not relevant for anything you mentioned explicitly, but it > _would_ have triggered issue 2263 in case you were using _chord_ > _repetition_ in connection with \relative.
I definitely use a lot of chord repetition, and I always (= 99% of the time) use \relative. In fact, until only recently, most of my code had \relative {} instead of the now-promoted \relative x {} [where x is the first note in the music expression]. (I am slowly updating my old code to fix this.) Furthermore, I can report with total confidence that the bug I encountered was an octave displacement problem — I remember that vividly, since it was so irritating (and inexplicable). So it seems that > <URL:http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2263>, > previously > <URL:http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1110>. were/was almost certainly the problem(s). Can you say with 100% certainty that this issue is now solved, and hence that I will get identical results the my function and the simpler function (which I prefer)? Thanks, Kieren. p.s. I'm relieved to have proven to myself that my memory was to be trusted on this after all! =) _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user