On Sun, 11 Nov 2001 18:44:57 -0500 Douglas J Hunley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
---snip---
> not really what you asked for, but since you're doing this, might as well
go
> 2.4 ... it seems to be the most stable 2.x glibc yet from what I've
seen/heard
> --
Doug, was that version number supposed to be 2.2.4???
--
******************************************************************************
Registered Linux User Number 185956
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&safe=off&group=linux
10:40pm up 15 days, 5:45, 2 users, load average: 0.12, 0.13, 0.09
_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
