>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:    Non-member submission from [Dave Crocker 
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]   
>Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 02:44:38 -0400 (EDT)
>
>>From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Sun Jul 18 02:44:37 1999
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Received: from postman.bayarea.net (postman.bayarea.net [205.219.84.13])
>       by ns1.vrx.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358FEF047
>       for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 18 Jul 1999 02:44:37 -0400 (EDT)
>Received: from shell2.bayarea.net (shell2.bayarea.net [205.219.84.7])
>       by postman.bayarea.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA20242;
>       Sat, 17 Jul 1999 23:38:28 -0700 (PDT)
>Received: from dave-vaio (free.88.106.bayarea.net [205.219.88.106])
>       by shell2.bayarea.net (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA06784;
>       Sat, 17 Jul 1999 23:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
>Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.56 (Beta)
>Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 23:29:11 -0700
>To: Jay Fenello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>From: Dave Crocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
>       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <v03102802b3b6759a12eb@[202.27.208.23]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>
>At 11:19 PM 7/17/99 , Jay Fenello wrote:
>>Yea, at least 21,000,000.
>>...
>>Yea, we need to be able to handle
>>every living, breathing, person on
>
>
>Jay, thank you for sharing your large-scale systems development experience 
>with us.
>
>Apparently you have not noticed the scale of Internet growth and the need 
>for protecting against 'success failures', namely inability to meet 
>unexpectedly large demand.  A scenario in which the global Internet's 
>administrative lead, ICANN, has participation by a substantial fraction of 
>Internet users should not be so quickly dismissed by one who claims 
>interest in popularization and openness of the net.
>
>It does not take sophisticated math to develop a projection in which ICANN 
>might have to tally many millions of votes.  The particular choice of 21M 
>was, rather heavy-handedly of course, convenient in the sequence, to 
>underscore the basic misunderstanding of scaling requirements at play in 
>the discussion thread.
>
>As always, Jay, your seriousness, expertise and constructive input are most 
>appreciated.
>
>d/
>
>
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>Dave Crocker                                         Tel: +1 408 246 8253
>Brandenburg Consulting                               Fax: +1 408 273 6464
>675 Spruce Drive                             <http://www.brandenburg.com>
>Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA                 <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
--
Richard Sexton  |  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  | http://dns.vrx.net/tech/rootzone
http://killifish.vrx.net    http://www.mbz.org    http://lists.aquaria.net
Bannockburn, Ontario, Canada,  70 & 72 280SE, 83 300SD   +1 (613) 473-1719

Reply via email to