What we all neglect to take into consideration in the cost of energy
production is the "collateral damage". It is true that close to 50
percent of all electrical power generation comes from burning coal. Do
we count the environmental costs? The irrevocably altered and destroyed
mountains? The affects of carbon emissions upon our planet and all its
inhabitants? The health costs of degraded air? Degraded water quality?
Damage to fisheries and forests ?

Most of us are very short sighted and selfish when we figure the cost of
the electricity we consume. We need to expand our consciousness to
realize the costs all beings on our little planet pay for our heavily
subsidized  "cheap" electricity.  

When you add the environmental subsidy to carbon (and nuclear) produced
electricity it is plain that power generated from renewable wind, solar
and other non carbon or fusion sources are by far a much better buy. 
Philip

On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 17:47 -0700, Lew Hodgett wrote:
> 
> 
> Basically about $0.14/KWH which is in line with the rest of the
> country 
> except those subsidized area such as TVA, hudro in the NW, etc.
-- 
Philip Lange AE4OV
USSV  ORYOKI
Edenton, NC
There is no sense in having a plan if you're not going to pretend to follow it.
 

_______________________________________________
Liveaboard mailing list
[email protected]
To adjust your membership settings over the web 
http://www.liveaboardnow.org/mailman/listinfo/liveaboard
To subscribe send an email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
The archives are at http://www.liveaboardnow.org/pipermail/liveaboard/

To search the archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

The Mailman Users Guide can be found here 
http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-member/index.html

Reply via email to