On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 04:30:08AM -0000, Andrew Bowman wrote:
> 
> P.S. I suggest we consider redefining [OT] in subject lines to indicate 'on
> topic' - since this will, for most posts to London PM, reduce the amount of
> typing ;-)

Oh, does OT mean something else?  :-)

dha, who notes that, for something to be O(n|ff) Topic, there needs to
*be* a topic...

-- 
David H. Adler - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
Although, of course, it will be $ME in line with the usual practice of
SHOUTING OUT MAGIC VARIABLES.       - Damian Conway

Reply via email to