On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 18:20, the hatter wrote: > I knew sol8 did, but if 9 seems to as well, then I'm both slightly > surprised, and rather happy. Any idea what the minimum ram necessary is ? > or how much have you got, and does it seem to have any big speed problems > in places that you'd attribute to lack of memory ?
I've only got 64Mb of ram on the SS5/170 that I'm running 9 on and it seems no better and no worse than Solaris 8 on that platform. As always I'm sure that it would be happier with at least 128Mb. I was quite surprised that 9 ran on sun4m as the first beta was sun4u only but the beta refresh doesn't have that restriction. Shame they dropped Solaris 9/x86 though. Regards Clive -- Clive Hills | Unemployed Solaris/Linux sysadmin | e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Crayford | Universe/Reality/Pick DBA | t: 01322 550166 Kent UK | Looking for work in City/West End | t: 07997 013387
