Hi all,
to extend the flame ;):
it is true that putting several partitions makes it more secure, but will be 
a headache if you run out of space on one partition. So, why not use LVM? - 
I've come along a perl-script (one year ago already) which makes it possible 
to GRAPHICALLY resize your partitons, add new space, etc.
I didn't really check this script out neither I played around a long time 
with LVM. I know in the kernel it was labled "experimental" all the time. 
What's the current status - or your experience. Reiserfs was called 
experimental but was there in suse6.4 already or even earlier. I (personally) 
ALWAYS had good experience (I sticked to the suse-version though - they NEVER 
gave problems). My 486 rebootet about a 200 times due to a faulty UPS and lot 
of powerfails and always it was working fine again after that.
Some things are just not included into the standart kernel (labled as 
experimental) cause they need a clean rewriting for example.
So again - what's your experience with LVM - and what's your advice. LVM is a 
great piece of software and you get patched boot-images for RH for example to 
install it directly - so why (besides that you have to read a little about it 
:)) not use it?

rgds,

Tom


On Thursday 25 July 2002 00:50, Michael Marschall wrote:
> It also avoids the situation where your system becomes more or less
> unuseable due to some log in /var filling up the filesystem.
>
> Michael
>
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Jim Wildman wrote:
> > The other important directory to have its own partition is /var.  If a
> > machine crashes, there will be open files in /var.  Best to have it on a
> > separate partition that is easily fsck-able and easily replaceable.  If
> > I've got the space, I'll go for a gig of /var.
> >
> > It also reduces some of the denial of service possiblities.
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Jim Wildman, CISSP                                      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.rossberry.com
> >
> > On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Brian Fahrlander wrote:
> > > On Wed, 24 Jul 2002 18:07:01 +0200 (CEST), Alessandro Selli 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Il giorno Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Evgeny Limarenko così ha scritto:
> > >
> > > [snipped]
> > >
> > > > |/boot should be of small size like 32Mb. Swap can be big enough,
> > > > |something like twice an amount of RAM. The rest is for /.
> > > >
> > > >   This is the easiest implementation, but not the safest when you're
> > > > setting up a server that is going to be accessed by many users, and
> > > > that offers them several services.
> > > >
> > > >   All this IMHO, of course.
> > >
> > >     No, I concur; if I'm just working on my own workstation, this is
> > > exactly the way I do it, sharing one large root partition and all that.
> > >
> > >     But if there's any uncontrolled access (like, anyone else but
> > > me...) I like making the /homes and /tmp partitions seperate and mount
> > > them with the arguments to mount that tells it to disallow device files
> > > and SUID programs and such.  This makes it more safe...and you're
> > > right; having /home on another drive lessens the chances of losing all
> > > the user's files in the event of a crash...
> > >
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >- Brian Fahrländer              Linux Zealot, Conservative, and
> > > Technomad Evansville, IN                    My Voyage:
> > > http://www.CounterMoon.com ICQ  5119262
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >- I don't want to hear news from Isreal until the news contains the
> > > words "Bullet", "Brain", and "Arafat".
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > > _____________________________________________________________________
> > > Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
> > >       https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
> > > For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.openprojects.net
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > _____________________________________________________________________
> > Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
> >       https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
> > For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.openprojects.net
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _____________________________________________________________________
> Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
>       https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
> For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.openprojects.net


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing 
real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! 
http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
      https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.openprojects.net

Reply via email to