They certainly do sound lovely.  I wonder if we'll ever know just how
   the thickest gut basses were made back in the day.  Certainly the roped
   ones, while being flexible enough to play in tune all the way up the
   fingerboard, do sound 'thuddy' to modern ears.  Is that something that
   would have been acceptable in the 16th/17th centuries, or did they make
   better basses?  Judging by the sizes of holes in original bridges their
   basses must have been thinner than our roped ones, so I guess they had
   a different way of making them.  'Loaded' gut certainly sounds good,
   but is that what they did?  It all helps keep life interesting for
   string researchers.

   Getting back to Arto's question, it would seem that some 6c instruments
   had 12 pegs, whether they had a single or a double first.  I would
   guess the customers were keeping their options open.  It seems to me
   that there's no reason why a lutenist today shouldn't take the same
   approach and have an instrument that could be strung either way.
   A couple of my own lutes have a peg more than I actually use right now,
   but it means I can change my mind without changing my instrument.  My
   7c has 14 pegs and my 10c has 20 pegs, which means I can change it to
   an 11c with a single second any time I want (with a differen nut and an
   extra hole in the bridge).

   Bill
   From: Edward Martin <e...@gamutstrings.com>
   To: William Samson <willsam...@yahoo.co.uk>; Edward Martin
   <e...@gamutstrings.com>
   Sent: Sunday, 20 November 2011, 21:29
   Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Double 1st string on 6 course lutes?
   Thanks for the comments.  On those instruments, we have octaves only at
   the 6th, and on one instrument, also at the 5th.  Those you-tubes are
   from a performance in Gijon, Spain , this summer.  I actually received
   some criticism on the stringing, being told we should have unisons, and
   double first courses.  The reasons stated were due to polyphony,
   getting an even sound.  I am not so certain as I think those Chambure
   vihuelas sound nice as they are strung.
   ed
   At 01:52 PM 11/20/2011, William Samson wrote:
   > That's great!  Are these both octave strung instruments on your Duo
   Chambure Youtubes?  The sound is gorgeous!
   > Bill
   >
   > From: Edward Martin <[1]e...@gamutstrings.com>
   > To: William Samson <[2]willsam...@yahoo.co.uk>;
   "[3]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu" <[4]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   > Sent: Sunday, 20 November 2011, 18:58
   > Subject: [LUTE] Re: Double 1st string on 6 course lutes?
   >
   > Thanks, Bill.
   >
   > I have my vihuelas set up in gut, with octaves on 4, 5, and 6.  It
   > sounds charming, and yes, I do play Milan on it!
   >
   > ed
   >
   > At 12:53 PM 11/20/2011, William Samson wrote:
   > >    Certainly, Ed.  But how many vihuelas do we see nowadays in
   these
   > >    configurations?  In fact I wonder if there's a single one that
   isn't
   > >    set up with unisons throughout and a double first?  We're very
   > >    conservative (with a small 'c') when it comes to pushing the
   envelope.
   > >    I wonder if there was any recognised difference between how
   lutes and
   > >    vihuelas were strung in a given place at the time.  Nowadays,
   though,
   > >    we're very blinkered about it all and conform to templates which
   are in
   > >    some ways questionable.
   > >    I'd love to hear Milan, say, played on an octave strung vihuela,
   or
   > >    Milano on a unison strung 6c lute.
   > >    Bill
   > >    From: Edward Martin
   <<mailto:[5]e...@gamutstrings.com>[6]e...@gamutstrings.com>
   > >    To: William Samson
   <<mailto:[7]willsam...@yahoo.co.uk>[8]willsam...@yahoo.co.uk>;
   "<mailto:[9]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>[10]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu"
   > >    <<mailto:[11]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>[12]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   > >    Sent: Sunday, 20 November 2011, 18:31
   > >    Subject: [LUTE] Re: Double 1st string on 6 course lutes?
   > >    Thanks for the reference, Bill.  There have been new discoveries
   > >    since the time the article was written, where we now cannot
   claim
   > >    that vihuelas were string in unison.  Some were, others were
   > >    not.  They may have had the double first course, but there is
   > >    evidence to the contrary that some vihuelas were string in
   octaves on
   > >    4,5, and 6th courses.
   > >    ed
   > >    At 12:02 PM 11/20/2011, William Samson wrote:
   > >    >    I've found the reference - Segerman and Abbott, FoMRHI Comm
   number
   > >    30,
   > >    >    July 1976
   > >    >
   [1][1]<[13]http://www.fomrhi.org/uploads/bulletins/Fomrhi-004.pdf>[14]h
   ttp://www.fomrhi.org/uploads/bulletins/Fomrhi-004.pdf
   > >    >
   > >    >    They say (p37) "Instruments which come to mind that had
   double
   > >    first
   > >    >    courses and unison basses were
   > >    >    1. Vihuela
   > >    >    2. Robinson (1603) and Dowland (1610) lute.
   > >    >    3. At least some late 16th century Italian lutes. . . . ."
   > >    >
   > >    >    They give references on which they base these statements.
   > >    >
   > >    >    Interesting stuff.  What I find odd is that we've been
   channelled
   > >    into
   > >    >    a mindset where just about all 6c lutes built nowadays have
   single
   > >    >    first courses and octaves on 6, 5 and 4.  Lutes with 7 or
   more
   > >    courses
   > >    >    have unisons on 5, 4, 3, 2 and a single first, and octaves
   from 6
   > >    >    downwards.  11 and 13 c lutes have single 1st and second
   courses
   > >    but
   > >    >    12c lutes have double second courses.  All very formulaic
   and I'm
   > >    as
   > >    >    guilty as anyone of following these 'rules'.  But there's
   plenty
   > >    of
   > >    >    evidence of more varied configurations in use at the time,
   and it
   > >    would
   > >    >    be surprising if there wasn't.  It's a pity that these
   differences
   > >    >    don't show up in modern practice, though I fully understand
   why -
   > >    >    resale value for example, and maybe an assumption that as
   these
   > >    seem to
   > >    >    have ended up as the most successful configurations at the
   time,
   > >    >    there's no need to explore anything else.
   > >    >
   > >    >    Bill
   > >    >
   > >    >    PS Oh yes - and octave stringing works out cheaper too :o)
   > >    >    From: Daniel Winheld
   <[2]<mailto:[15]dwinh...@comcast.net>[16]dwinh...@comcast.net>
   > >    >    To: William Samson
   <[3]<mailto:[17]willsam...@yahoo.co.uk>[18]willsam...@yahoo.co.uk>
   > >    >    Cc:
   "[4]<mailto:[19]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>[20]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu"
   <[5]<mailto:[21]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>[22]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   > >    >    Sent: Sunday, 20 November 2011, 17:05
   > >    >    Subject: [LUTE] Re: Double 1st string on 6 course lutes?
   > >    >    >> " I seem to remember that lutes with a double
   chanterelle were
   > >    >    usually strung in unisons."
   > >    >    Mimmo Peruffo disputes that assumption:  from his website
   page
   > >    "The
   > >    >    lute in its historical reality"-
   > >    >    9. Double treble and unison courses: the fact that the
   vihuela was
   > >    >    generally (but not always) strung with a double treble led
   some
   > >    >    scholars to take that as evidence in favour of all courses
   having
   > >    been
   > >    >    strung with unisons. We fail to grasp the logic of it.
   There is,
   > >    on the
   > >    >    other hand, evidence proving that the vihuela could have a
   single
   > >    >    treble, whereas most Renaissance lutes where strung with
   double
   > >    >    trebles.
   > >    >
   [2][6]<[23]http://www.mimmoperuffo.org/9e.htm>[24]http://www.mimmoperuf
   fo.org/9e.htm
   > >    >    On Nov 19, 2011, at 11:42 PM, William Samson wrote:
   > >    >    >  Again - I've forgotten the source (probably Eph
   Segerman), but
   > >    I
   > >    >    seem
   > >    >    >  to remember that lutes with a double chanterelle were
   usually
   > >    strung
   > >    >    in
   > >    >    >  unisons.  I do know that Eph had a 7c lute made like
   this and
   > >    strung
   > >    >    >  with catlines (his own manufacture - Northern
   Renaissance
   > >    >    Instruments)
   > >    >    >  in the basses.  It certainly worked very well, but
   sounded
   > >    'darker'
   > >    >    >  than a lute with octave stringing in the basses.
   > >    >    >  Bill
   > >    >    >  From: wikla
   <[3][7]<mailto:[25]wi...@cs.helsinki.fi>[26]wi...@cs.helsinki.fi>
   > >    >    >  To:
   [4][8]<mailto:[27]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>[28]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   > >    >    >  Sent: Saturday, 19 November 2011, 20:51
   > >    >    >  Subject: [LUTE] Re: Double 1st string on 6 course lutes?
   > >    >    >  Thanks to all for the most interesting answers!
   > >    >    >  I actually just ordered a 6 courser, model Venere (the
   > >    original, the
   > >    >    >  model,
   > >    >    >  was a 7 courser, I suppose?) from Lauri Niskanen, the
   guy who
   > >    made
   > >    >    my
   > >    >    >  new
   > >    >    >  11 courser. And I ordered an option to double
   chanterelle -
   > >    just one
   > >    >    >  extra
   > >    >    >  peg, just 3 grooves and 3 holes up and down.
   > >    >    >  Any more constructive ideas what to hope and ask?
   > >    >    >  best,
   > >    >    >  Arto
   > >    >    >  To get on or off this list see list information at
   > >    >    >
   [1][5][9]<[29]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html>[3
   0]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   > >    >    >
   > >    >    >  --
   > >    >    >
   > >    >    > References
   > >    >    >
   > >    >    >  1.
   > >
   [6][10]<[31]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html>[32]
   http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   > >    >    >
   > >    >    --
   > >    >
   > >    >    --
   > >    >
   > >    >References
   > >    >
   > >    >    1.
   [11]<[33]http://www.fomrhi.org/uploads/bulletins/Fomrhi-004.pdf>[34]htt
   p://www.fomrhi.org/uploads/bulletins/Fomrhi-004.pdf
   > >    >    2.
   [12]<[35]http://www.mimmoperuffo.org/9e.htm>[36]http://www.mimmoperuffo
   .org/9e.htm
   > >    >    3. mailto:[13][37]wi...@cs.helsinki.fi
   > >    >    4. mailto:[14][38]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   > >    >    5.
   [15]<[39]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html>[40]htt
   p://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   > >    >    6.
   [16]<[41]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html>[42]htt
   p://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   > >    Edward Martin
   > >    2817 East 2nd Street
   > >    Duluth, Minnesota  55812
   > >    e-mail:
   [17]<mailto:[43]e...@gamutstrings.com>[44]e...@gamutstrings.com
   > >    voice:  (218) 728-1202
   > >
   [18]<[45]http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871&ref=name>[46
   ]http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871&ref=name
   > >
   [19]<[47]http://www.myspace.com/edslute>[48]http://www.myspace.com/edsl
   ute
   > >
   [20]<[49]http://magnatune.com/artists/edward_martin>[50]http://magnatun
   e.com/artists/edward_martin
   > >
   > >    --
   > >
   > >References
   > >
   > >    1.
   <[51]http://www.fomrhi.org/uploads/bulletins/Fomrhi-004.pdf>[52]http://
   www.fomrhi.org/uploads/bulletins/Fomrhi-004.pdf
   > >    2. mailto:[53]dwinh...@comcast.net
   > >    3. mailto:[54]willsam...@yahoo.co.uk
   > >    4. mailto:[55]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   > >    5. mailto:[56]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   > >    6.
   <[57]http://www.mimmoperuffo.org/9e.htm>[58]http://www.mimmoperuffo.org
   /9e.htm
   > >    7. mailto:[59]wi...@cs.helsinki.fi
   > >    8. mailto:[60]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   > >    9.
   <[61]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html>[62]http://
   www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   > >  10. [63]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   > >  11.
   <[64]http://www.fomrhi.org/uploads/bulletins/Fomrhi-004.pdf>[65]http://
   www.fomrhi.org/uploads/bulletins/Fomrhi-004.pdf
   > >  12. [66]http://www.mimmoperuffo.org/9e.htm
   > >  13. mailto:[67]wi...@cs.helsinki.fi
   > >  14. mailto:[68]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   > >  15.
   <[69]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html>[70]http://
   www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   > >  16. [71]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   > >  17. mailto:[72]e...@gamutstrings.com
   > >  18.
   <[73]http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871&ref=name>[74]htt
   p://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871&ref=name
   > >  19. [75]http://www.myspace.com/edslute
   > >  20.
   <[76]http://magnatune.com/artists/edward_martin>[77]http://magnatune.co
   m/artists/edward_martin
   >
   >
   >
   > Edward Martin
   > 2817 East 2nd Street
   > Duluth, Minnesota  55812
   > e-mail:  <mailto:[78]e...@gamutstrings.com>[79]e...@gamutstrings.com
   > voice:  (218) 728-1202
   >
   <[80]http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871&ref=name>[81]htt
   p://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871&ref=name
   > [82]http://www.myspace.com/edslute
   >
   <[83]http://magnatune.com/artists/edward_martin>[84]http://magnatune.co
   m/artists/edward_martin
   >
   >
   >
   >
   Edward Martin
   2817 East 2nd Street
   Duluth, Minnesota  55812
   e-mail:  [85]e...@gamutstrings.com
   voice:  (218) 728-1202
   [86]http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871&ref=name
   [87]http://www.myspace.com/edslute
   [88]http://magnatune.com/artists/edward_martin

   --

References

   1. mailto:e...@gamutstrings.com
   2. mailto:willsam...@yahoo.co.uk
   3. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   4. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   5. mailto:e...@gamutstrings.com
   6. mailto:e...@gamutstrings.com
   7. mailto:willsam...@yahoo.co.uk
   8. mailto:willsam...@yahoo.co.uk
   9. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  10. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  11. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  12. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  13. http://www.fomrhi.org/uploads/bulletins/Fomrhi-004.pdf
  14. http://www.fomrhi.org/uploads/bulletins/Fomrhi-004.pdf
  15. mailto:dwinh...@comcast.net
  16. mailto:dwinh...@comcast.net
  17. mailto:willsam...@yahoo.co.uk
  18. mailto:willsam...@yahoo.co.uk
  19. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  20. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  21. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  22. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  23. http://www.mimmoperuffo.org/9e.htm
  24. http://www.mimmoperuffo.org/9e.htm
  25. mailto:wi...@cs.helsinki.fi
  26. mailto:wi...@cs.helsinki.fi
  27. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  28. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  29. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  30. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  31. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  32. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  33. http://www.fomrhi.org/uploads/bulletins/Fomrhi-004.pdf
  34. http://www.fomrhi.org/uploads/bulletins/Fomrhi-004.pdf
  35. http://www.mimmoperuffo.org/9e.htm
  36. http://www.mimmoperuffo.org/9e.htm
  37. mailto:wi...@cs.helsinki.fi
  38. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  39. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  40. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  41. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  42. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  43. mailto:e...@gamutstrings.com
  44. mailto:e...@gamutstrings.com
  45. http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871&ref=name
  46. http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871&ref=name
  47. http://www.myspace.com/edslute
  48. http://www.myspace.com/edslute
  49. http://magnatune.com/artists/edward_martin
  50. http://magnatune.com/artists/edward_martin
  51. http://www.fomrhi.org/uploads/bulletins/Fomrhi-004.pdf
  52. http://www.fomrhi.org/uploads/bulletins/Fomrhi-004.pdf
  53. mailto:dwinh...@comcast.net
  54. mailto:willsam...@yahoo.co.uk
  55. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  56. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  57. http://www.mimmoperuffo.org/9e.htm
  58. http://www.mimmoperuffo.org/9e.htm
  59. mailto:wi...@cs.helsinki.fi
  60. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  61. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  62. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  63. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  64. http://www.fomrhi.org/uploads/bulletins/Fomrhi-004.pdf
  65. http://www.fomrhi.org/uploads/bulletins/Fomrhi-004.pdf
  66. http://www.mimmoperuffo.org/9e.htm
  67. mailto:wi...@cs.helsinki.fi
  68. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  69. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  70. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  71. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  72. mailto:e...@gamutstrings.com
  73. http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871&ref=name
  74. http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871&ref=name
  75. http://www.myspace.com/edslute
  76. http://magnatune.com/artists/edward_martin
  77. http://magnatune.com/artists/edward_martin
  78. mailto:e...@gamutstrings.com
  79. mailto:e...@gamutstrings.com
  80. http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871&ref=name
  81. http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871&ref=name
  82. http://www.myspace.com/edslute
  83. http://magnatune.com/artists/edward_martin
  84. http://magnatune.com/artists/edward_martin
  85. mailto:e...@gamutstrings.com
  86. http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871&ref=name
  87. http://www.myspace.com/edslute
  88. http://magnatune.com/artists/edward_martin

Reply via email to