Thanks, Bill.

I have my vihuelas set up in gut, with octaves on 4, 5, and 6.  It 
sounds charming, and yes, I do play Milan on it!

ed

At 12:53 PM 11/20/2011, William Samson wrote:
>    Certainly, Ed.  But how many vihuelas do we see nowadays in these
>    configurations?  In fact I wonder if there's a single one that isn't
>    set up with unisons throughout and a double first?  We're very
>    conservative (with a small 'c') when it comes to pushing the envelope.
>    I wonder if there was any recognised difference between how lutes and
>    vihuelas were strung in a given place at the time.  Nowadays, though,
>    we're very blinkered about it all and conform to templates which are in
>    some ways questionable.
>    I'd love to hear Milan, say, played on an octave strung vihuela, or
>    Milano on a unison strung 6c lute.
>    Bill
>    From: Edward Martin <e...@gamutstrings.com>
>    To: William Samson <willsam...@yahoo.co.uk>; "lute@cs.dartmouth.edu"
>    <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
>    Sent: Sunday, 20 November 2011, 18:31
>    Subject: [LUTE] Re: Double 1st string on 6 course lutes?
>    Thanks for the reference, Bill.  There have been new discoveries
>    since the time the article was written, where we now cannot claim
>    that vihuelas were string in unison.  Some were, others were
>    not.  They may have had the double first course, but there is
>    evidence to the contrary that some vihuelas were string in octaves on
>    4,5, and 6th courses.
>    ed
>    At 12:02 PM 11/20/2011, William Samson wrote:
>    >    I've found the reference - Segerman and Abbott, FoMRHI Comm number
>    30,
>    >    July 1976
>    >    [1][1]http://www.fomrhi.org/uploads/bulletins/Fomrhi-004.pdf
>    >
>    >    They say (p37) "Instruments which come to mind that had double
>    first
>    >    courses and unison basses were
>    >    1. Vihuela
>    >    2. Robinson (1603) and Dowland (1610) lute.
>    >    3. At least some late 16th century Italian lutes. . . . ."
>    >
>    >    They give references on which they base these statements.
>    >
>    >    Interesting stuff.  What I find odd is that we've been channelled
>    into
>    >    a mindset where just about all 6c lutes built nowadays have single
>    >    first courses and octaves on 6, 5 and 4.  Lutes with 7 or more
>    courses
>    >    have unisons on 5, 4, 3, 2 and a single first, and octaves from 6
>    >    downwards.  11 and 13 c lutes have single 1st and second courses
>    but
>    >    12c lutes have double second courses.  All very formulaic and I'm
>    as
>    >    guilty as anyone of following these 'rules'.  But there's plenty
>    of
>    >    evidence of more varied configurations in use at the time, and it
>    would
>    >    be surprising if there wasn't.  It's a pity that these differences
>    >    don't show up in modern practice, though I fully understand why -
>    >    resale value for example, and maybe an assumption that as these
>    seem to
>    >    have ended up as the most successful configurations at the time,
>    >    there's no need to explore anything else.
>    >
>    >    Bill
>    >
>    >    PS Oh yes - and octave stringing works out cheaper too :o)
>    >    From: Daniel Winheld <[2]dwinh...@comcast.net>
>    >    To: William Samson <[3]willsam...@yahoo.co.uk>
>    >    Cc: "[4]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu" <[5]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
>    >    Sent: Sunday, 20 November 2011, 17:05
>    >    Subject: [LUTE] Re: Double 1st string on 6 course lutes?
>    >    >> " I seem to remember that lutes with a double chanterelle were
>    >    usually strung in unisons."
>    >    Mimmo Peruffo disputes that assumption:  from his website page
>    "The
>    >    lute in its historical reality"-
>    >    9. Double treble and unison courses: the fact that the vihuela was
>    >    generally (but not always) strung with a double treble led some
>    >    scholars to take that as evidence in favour of all courses having
>    been
>    >    strung with unisons. We fail to grasp the logic of it. There is,
>    on the
>    >    other hand, evidence proving that the vihuela could have a single
>    >    treble, whereas most Renaissance lutes where strung with double
>    >    trebles.
>    >    [2][6]http://www.mimmoperuffo.org/9e.htm
>    >    On Nov 19, 2011, at 11:42 PM, William Samson wrote:
>    >    >  Again - I've forgotten the source (probably Eph Segerman), but
>    I
>    >    seem
>    >    >  to remember that lutes with a double chanterelle were usually
>    strung
>    >    in
>    >    >  unisons.  I do know that Eph had a 7c lute made like this and
>    strung
>    >    >  with catlines (his own manufacture - Northern Renaissance
>    >    Instruments)
>    >    >  in the basses.  It certainly worked very well, but sounded
>    'darker'
>    >    >  than a lute with octave stringing in the basses.
>    >    >  Bill
>    >    >  From: wikla <[3][7]wi...@cs.helsinki.fi>
>    >    >  To: [4][8]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
>    >    >  Sent: Saturday, 19 November 2011, 20:51
>    >    >  Subject: [LUTE] Re: Double 1st string on 6 course lutes?
>    >    >  Thanks to all for the most interesting answers!
>    >    >  I actually just ordered a 6 courser, model Venere (the
>    original, the
>    >    >  model,
>    >    >  was a 7 courser, I suppose?) from Lauri Niskanen, the guy who
>    made
>    >    my
>    >    >  new
>    >    >  11 courser. And I ordered an option to double chanterelle -
>    just one
>    >    >  extra
>    >    >  peg, just 3 grooves and 3 holes up and down.
>    >    >  Any more constructive ideas what to hope and ask?
>    >    >  best,
>    >    >  Arto
>    >    >  To get on or off this list see list information at
>    >    >  [1][5][9]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>    >    >
>    >    >  --
>    >    >
>    >    > References
>    >    >
>    >    >  1.
>    [6][10]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>    >    >
>    >    --
>    >
>    >    --
>    >
>    >References
>    >
>    >    1. [11]http://www.fomrhi.org/uploads/bulletins/Fomrhi-004.pdf
>    >    2. [12]http://www.mimmoperuffo.org/9e.htm
>    >    3. mailto:[13]wi...@cs.helsinki.fi
>    >    4. mailto:[14]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
>    >    5. [15]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>    >    6. [16]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>    Edward Martin
>    2817 East 2nd Street
>    Duluth, Minnesota  55812
>    e-mail:  [17]e...@gamutstrings.com
>    voice:  (218) 728-1202
>    [18]http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871&ref=name
>    [19]http://www.myspace.com/edslute
>    [20]http://magnatune.com/artists/edward_martin
>
>    --
>
>References
>
>    1. http://www.fomrhi.org/uploads/bulletins/Fomrhi-004.pdf
>    2. mailto:dwinh...@comcast.net
>    3. mailto:willsam...@yahoo.co.uk
>    4. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
>    5. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
>    6. http://www.mimmoperuffo.org/9e.htm
>    7. mailto:wi...@cs.helsinki.fi
>    8. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
>    9. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>   10. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>   11. http://www.fomrhi.org/uploads/bulletins/Fomrhi-004.pdf
>   12. http://www.mimmoperuffo.org/9e.htm
>   13. mailto:wi...@cs.helsinki.fi
>   14. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
>   15. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>   16. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>   17. mailto:e...@gamutstrings.com
>   18. http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871&ref=name
>   19. http://www.myspace.com/edslute
>   20. http://magnatune.com/artists/edward_martin



Edward Martin
2817 East 2nd Street
Duluth, Minnesota  55812
e-mail:  e...@gamutstrings.com
voice:  (218) 728-1202
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871&ref=name
http://www.myspace.com/edslute
http://magnatune.com/artists/edward_martin



Reply via email to