On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:46:38AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > Yes, but I don't think I want implement this. We would need a 'stateful > cursor' again to distiguish between '{' pressed or not, and editing > probably would get a mess again. How should editing work when you want to > change a_i to a_{ij}?
No you don't. If '{' is not pressed, the cursor is in a 'single char subscript'. If '{' is pressed, the cursor is in a full blown box math (inset). So the cursor's state is expressed by where it is? Jules