Hi,

Ted and I remained close friends after the merger and both of us  
getting chucked out of the company (me as a VP, he as a director).   
Since FS, he has started a micro start-up called Henter Math (I think  
their URL is www.hentermath.com).

HenterMath has been a disappointment so far and sat around on the  
shelf for a couple of years but I believe he's working on it again.   
We've both been pretty busy so I've only talked to him once we got to  
Cambridge so this information may be stale already.

Ted also enjoys his retirement.  He has a home in Panama, two in  
Florida and travels a lot.  He's a terrific guy whom I always enjoy  
being around.

cdh



On Aug 14, 2009, at 5:45 PM, hank smith wrote:

>
> what is he doing these days? any one know?
> On Aug 14, 2009, at 7:08 AM, Daniel Crone wrote:
>
>>
>> I remember the early jaws days.  I knew that Ted Henter and all the
>> people there really gave their all.  Seems that when a company is
>> small, it is easy for it to keep its focus.
>> On Aug 14, 2009, at 5:56 AM, Chris Hofstader wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I couldn't agree with you more as regards Apple and its efforts
>>> toward universal access.
>>>
>>> I understand the feeling you must have when the kid went off to
>>> school with a new talking iPod as, when I worked at HJ/FS, i was
>>> well aware that every new copy of JAWS that went out the door
>>> probably meant that someone got a job, is starting in college or
>>> furthering their scholastic life with a good tool.  This was pounded
>>> into our heads by Ted Henter to whom every customer was special.
>>> Things became less satisfying in the FS days as, when Ted was in
>>> charge, he would virtually shut down the software engineering
>>> department until we fixed a bug or two for a single customer who had
>>> trouble doing his job.  Now it's all about monthly/quarterly revenue
>>> figures than about the end user.  It's sad but I neither own the
>>> company nor do I work there anymore.
>>>
>>>
>>> As regards other companies who make somewhat accessible items,  the
>>> community should reward them in proportion to the number of features
>>> we can use versus those we cannot.  If a product is 25% accessible
>>> for people with vision impairment, then we should give them a 25%
>>> pat on the back while handing them a list of the 75% of the features
>>> that they need to improve.
>>>
>>> Often, especially on iPhone and Windows Mobile, a program will be
>>> accessible, at least in part, because the API gives a lot of
>>> automatic accessibility so some of the software out there will b
>>> usable by default.  I think the authors of such software should be
>>> contacted and applauded even if they didn't know they made an
>>> accessible application as it may help convince them to work with the
>>> community in the future to ensure their accessibility continues.
>>>
>>> Some companies or groups within a company are virtually hostile to
>>> our requests for accessibility.  I have found that the entire
>>> product line from Intuit works very poorly with any and all screen
>>> readers but no matter how many emails and phone calls later, they
>>> refuse to give the screen reader authors even the tiniest crumb.
>>> Intuit and companies like it may require the stick as all of the
>>> carrots we've supplied were spit back out.
>>>
>>> cdh
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 13, 2009, at 12:07 PM, patrickneazer wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello Chris and all:
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I am a fan of more carrots and less stick if possible. Sticks
>>>> are easy to make though I do not know anyone who enjoys being hit
>>>> by one no matter how worthy or just the cause (grin).
>>>>
>>>> The best way to accomplish what is desired is to reward apple for
>>>> their innovation with both financial and public support.
>>>>
>>>> As a trainer there is nothing cooler than showing a parent a
>>>> talking ipod, having them purchase one for their child, having the
>>>> child take it to school and the child being queen or king for the
>>>> day and possibly longer (grin).
>>>>
>>>> That is priceless and customer loyalty will be established forever
>>>> (grin).
>>>>
>>>> And just think, people thought it just played music (grin).
>>>> On Aug 13, 2009, at 10:01 AM, Chris Blouch wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It would also be nice, albeit unmeasurable, that Apple would be
>>>>> rewarded for implementing universal design. I could then point to
>>>>> it as an example of what happens when a company does things right.
>>>>> I have lots of examples of when companies do things wrong (Target,
>>>>> PriceLine, Ramada and recently CVS). I'd like more carrot and less
>>>>> stick when I do presentations to developers or at conferences.
>>>>>
>>>>> CB
>>>>>
>>>>> Chris Hofstader wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello Chris the Other,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I agree with your thoughts on universal design.  Six or seven
>>>>>> years ago we found that a lot of rehab counselors were
>>>>>> downloading daily content from audible.com and listening on a PAC
>>>>>> Mate as they went from client to client in their cars.  this, I
>>>>>> suppose, was a bit of accidental universal design.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Apple seems to have really figured it out in the iPod Shuffle
>>>>>> where the product can be used by almost everyone straight out of
>>>>>> the box and no features are inaccessible to any portion of a
>>>>>> large universe of potential users.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I hope that Apple's leadership on this front will drag along
>>>>>> other mainstream players and that we'll start to see the
>>>>>> blinkosphere expand along with the universe.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> cdh
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 12, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Chris Blouch wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> With most mainstream popular products there is huge value in not
>>>>>>> only the thing itself but in the universe that surrounds it. The
>>>>>>> iPod being a case in point. There are jillions of add ons and
>>>>>>> public shared community knowledge which extending the value and
>>>>>>> uses far beyond what maker originally envisioned. This is the
>>>>>>> mainstream or universal access argument. If you can simply make
>>>>>>> an existing thing accessible you get the universe that goes with
>>>>>>> it for free. The VictorReader Stream may be a fine product, but
>>>>>>> being a niche product it will never have the vast array of
>>>>>>> cases, docking stations, FM tuners, chargers etc. Adding a
>>>>>>> screen reader to a PC is another big example which connected
>>>>>>> another audience to a large existing universe of tools.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> One of my favorite authors was Isaac Asimov who wrote a lot
>>>>>>> about robots, including some basic tenants about behavior and
>>>>>>> form. He postulated that they would have to be human form to
>>>>>>> work with the universe of existing devices and objects that were
>>>>>>> designed for our use. To make a robot that could only interface
>>>>>>> with special robot tools was doomed to failure in the long run.
>>>>>>> I think this idea can have application in accessible technology.
>>>>>>> Creating helper devices (tools) that work for all folks, not
>>>>>>> just blind, deaf, low cognition, ambulatory or whatever will
>>>>>>> bring the greatest long term success.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Of course everybody's favorite example of universal design is
>>>>>>> curb cuts which not only make places wheelchair accessible but
>>>>>>> are also great for baby strollers and shopping carts. I even
>>>>>>> know one guy who uses Voiceover on his laptop read off long
>>>>>>> reports while he is driving to work. Why not? Universal design
>>>>>>> goes both ways and I'm sure he wouldn't have sprung for Jaws
>>>>>>> just to do that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> CB
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Chris Hofstader wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No!  If we expect mainstream companies, like Apple for
>>>>>>>> instance, to follow the philosophy of universal design, then we
>>>>>>>> need to make sure they know how they can improve for our
>>>>>>>> segment of the universe.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> With Apple, we compared VO to JAWS; iPod to Zen Stone and
>>>>>>>> Victor Stream and iPhone to Mobile Speak on the AT side and the
>>>>>>>> LG with its built in "accessibility."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As there is a universe of products, we need to measure them
>>>>>>>> against each other.  Navigon, in my opinion, has a number of
>>>>>>>> things it does much better than the AT solutions (will show up
>>>>>>>> in a blog entry soon) but Mobile Speak does some other things
>>>>>>>> better.  For instance, if one wants to use an iPhone, Navigon
>>>>>>>> is just about the only solution.  It also costs a whole lot
>>>>>>>> less and, in my opinion, is vastly more precise.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> All technology needs to be compared on a reasonably level set
>>>>>>>> of criteria applied to all solutions, mainstream or blind guy
>>>>>>>> ghetto.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> cdh
>>>>>>>> On Aug 12, 2009, at 7:19 AM, patrickneazer wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hello Krister and all:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I would have just written I agree in this message though that
>>>>>>>>> would chew up unnecessary bandwidth and not really explain
>>>>>>>>> anything and no I am not taking a shop at the moderators with
>>>>>>>>> that statement because I actually agree with the policy. I am
>>>>>>>>> not usually a get it off my chester though ...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I do believe that when critiques are made against mainstream
>>>>>>>>> products and the evaluative measure for the critique is how it
>>>>>>>>> measures up to a community specific product, that is like
>>>>>>>>> comparing apples to oranges. What it also does is defeat the
>>>>>>>>> purpose of mainstream developers wanting to make things
>>>>>>>>> accessible. Why go out and make things accessible when what
>>>>>>>>> seems to be wanted is a blind specific product that already
>>>>>>>>> exists for $70.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I personally am tired of the argument that navigon is good for
>>>>>>>>> the $70. Navigon is a good app that actually is accessible.
>>>>>>>>> Now, I and others might have to access the information in a
>>>>>>>>> manner which is new or initially uncomfortable though that
>>>>>>>>> does not make the product inaccessible or poorly designed.
>>>>>>>>> What it does make the product is open to individual
>>>>>>>>> evaluation.In short, it is perfectly acceptable for a product
>>>>>>>>> to fit one persons needs, not fit a second persons needs, and
>>>>>>>>> still be both a good product which can always be improved.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Opened myself up for trouble (grin).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Aug 12, 2009, at 5:12 AM, Krister Ekstrom wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ok, Il moderatore, i know this is off-topic somewhat but i as
>>>>>>>>>> they say
>>>>>>>>>> in online business promoting mails, have to get it out of my
>>>>>>>>>> chest
>>>>>>>>>> before i explode! I think it's a bit unfair to compare
>>>>>>>>>> standard gps
>>>>>>>>>> solutions with those made strictly for blind folks and if
>>>>>>>>>> Navigon as a
>>>>>>>>>> standard gps solution makes a very good job of helping us
>>>>>>>>>> around the
>>>>>>>>>> place, it's great! What really would've been great would be
>>>>>>>>>> if someone
>>>>>>>>>> could do a podcast of a navigon session so that one may here
>>>>>>>>>> it in
>>>>>>>>>> action, rather like people have done with Wayfinder access
>>>>>>>>>> and Mobile
>>>>>>>>>> geo.
>>>>>>>>>> /Krister
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 11 aug 2009 kl. 14.10 skrev Chris G:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>> FYI Humanware Trekker is not using the Sendero SDK.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Chris
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:01:26 +0100
>>>>>>>>>>> william lomas <lomaswill...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> what will the update in december contain for navigon?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10 Aug 2009, at 18:50, Chris Hofstader wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> EI don't do podcasts.  I will write some blog entries on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> this stuff
>>>>>>>>>>>>> soon (www.blindconfidential.blogspot.com).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of those available to blinks, Wayfinder is the one I know
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the least
>>>>>>>>>>>>> about as I only used it for a month or so about a year
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ago.  Almost
>>>>>>>>>>>>> all of the players in the AT biz are using the same
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sendero engine.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, Humanware, Nuance, Freedom Scientific, Code Factory
>>>>>>>>>>>>> are all
>>>>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the same underneath but have different UI that one can
>>>>>>>>>>>>> pick from.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just based on my minimal experience with Navigon, though,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would
>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggest you stick with Wayfinder/Access until they put out
>>>>>>>>>>>>> an update
>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected in December.  Navigon is fine if you don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>> already have
>>>>>>>>>>>>> something but I wouldn't scrap your current solution quite
>>>>>>>>>>>>> yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> These opinions are mine and mine alone and are the result
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of messing
>>>>>>>>>>>>> around with Navigon for less than two days and I've been
>>>>>>>>>>>>> using
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mobile
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Geo very frequently since it came out and it is my
>>>>>>>>>>>>> favorite but that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is likely because it is the one with which I'm most
>>>>>>>>>>>>> familiar.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> cdh
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 10, 2009, at 9:40 AM, william lomas wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can you do a podcast on navigon so  ican hear it? at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> present i am a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wayfinder user and want to "hear" how it compares
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10 Aug 2009, at 14:09, Chris Hofstader wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> While I have had and enjoyed my iPhone for about a month
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> half, I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hadn't, before yesterday, needed to switch between
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running tasks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Specifically, I was following directions to our local
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> YWCA using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Navigon yesterday.  I received a phone call and, after
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hanging
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up, I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> couldn't figure out how to get back to Navigon to look
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things.  Navigon continued giving me directions but I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> back to its interface where VoiceOver reads the street
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> names and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> such.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I looked in the iPhone manual and searched on "task
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switching" and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "background task" using VO's search facility as well as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the one in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Preview and didn't find anything.  I can't believe that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too difficult but I can't find it in the manual given
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the search
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criteria I can think up.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any help will be appreciated.  I'm going back into the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manual to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what I might be able to find.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Happy Hacking,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cdh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --  
>>>>>>>>>>> Chris G <cgrabowsk...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Take good care and I wish you enough.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Love
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Me
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Take good care and I wish you enough.
>>>>
>>>> Love
>>>>
>>>> Me
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>>
>
>
> >


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to