Some excellent valid points Kevin, thank you.  You have given me even more to 
think about.
On 4 May 2011, at 01:28, Kevin Shaw wrote:

> A few points from me:
> 
> Windows comes with a screen reader called narrator. It's not as robust as 
> Voiceover, but Microsoft does "develop" it, much the same way as one vacuums 
> under the sofa—You're lucky if it's done every few years.
> 
> Yes, I agree with the initial suggestion. Tell Microsoft you want to 
> participate as a full user of their software. The squeaky wheel gets the 
> grease. Peer-selling can be of great benefit, like telling them that if a 
> company like DigiDesign can render a highly complex program like ProTools 
> accessible, it would be easy for Microsoft to do the same for its most 
> familiar productivity software.
> 
> We may also mention the fact that 65 to 70% of blind people are unemployed or 
> underemployed. Perhaps one person could take up the initiative, start a 
> petition and be the go to person when it comes to engaging Microsoft in a 
> dialog, much like my hero Slau did with ProTools. In which case, a carefully 
> articulated and well-crafted series of statements could bring light to this 
> issue.
> 
> In addition, opening lines of communication to the media on this issue could 
> also be of benefit to our cause. This is a large issue, as there is much to 
> explain to a largely sighted audience. Explaining how screen readers work is 
> one thing. Explaining how a popular program like MS Word doesn't work with a 
> Mac or Windows screen reader is a whole other challenge, orders of magnitude 
> beyond telling the journalist that talking computers let blind people surf 
> the web.
> 
> If it's at all possible, we could establish a list of people with the skills 
> and connections to create these documents, the petition, press releases and 
> other communication strategies to bring attention to this issue. If there is 
> a lawyer on the list (and I doubt it because no one answered my black's Law 
> Dictionary question), perhaps the mention of an anti-trust investigation will 
> get things moving. I say this with a bit of jest, so please don't fill the 
> list with messages bashing these suggestions.
> 
> I work for a radio station here in Canada and would be willing to invest 
> resources into getting this story told. If anyone else has a media contact or 
> connection, let's develop the tools that we need to tell this story.
> 
> the only question that remains is, are you ready to change the world?
> 
> Kevin
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

Reply via email to