Excellent points all.
On Jan 21, 2013, at 11:54 AM, Donna Goodin <doniado...@me.com> wrote:

> I am not a lawyer, so do not write the following from a legal perspective, 
> but rather from one of personal ethics.
> 
> For me, this is not an issue of civil disobedience.  there are basically two 
> factors that figure in my assessment of this service.
> 
> 1.  Most important, it is a streaming service.  None of us can "steal" 
> anything, when a show is over it's over.  I cannot download any content, and 
> there is no new content that resides on my PC.  I can't decide that I want to 
> watch a certain episode of Big Bang Theory whenever I want, I can only watch 
> whatever content is being streamed.  In that respect it is no different from 
> Tune-In, Ootoonz, etc.
> 
> 2.  For me, and I imagine that for many, use of this service will serve as an 
> additional option, not a replacement.  In my case, that means we will 
> continue our paid cable subscription, and our subscription to Netflix.  So, 
> my streaming Blindy TV on occasion will have no negative consequences at all 
> for the television industry.  If I'm not harming anyone else, and not 
> obtaining content than why not use it?
> 
> We all make decisions every day about how we respond to laws.  I've worked on 
> college campuses for years, and couldn't begin to estimate the number of 
> students who regularly just walk across the street, paying no heed to 
> traffic.  That is a violation of the law.  And moreover, it's one I disagree 
> with, largely for reasons of their personal well-being.  Yet you haven't yet 
> seen a campaign to round every one of those students up and put them in jail. 
>  So, it's a violation of the law that society has tacitly agreed to tolerate, 
> though we may think those students are exercising very poor judgment 
> sometimes.  If Karen truly obeys every single law to the letter, she's one of 
> a very small handful of people.
> Best,
> Donna
> On Jan 21, 2013, at 10:19 AM, Christine Grassman <cgrassman1...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
>> I know that in the UK, quite a lot of movies and television programs are 
>> described. Given that much of the audio description, except that done by 
>> WGBH, is narrated by a British narrator, I imagine most of it comes from the 
>> UK.
>> I think the main bone of contention here is "legally and fully available". 
>> *Some* (quite minimal) content is legally available, but for most, even 
>> these crumbs are not fully accessible, and for most, not accessible at all. 
>> Living in a household which consists of four blind and visually impaired 
>> people, I resent paying the fees for TWC that I do while not being able to 
>> watch programming which is described. My children cannot get as much out of 
>> documentaries they are directed to watch by their teachers. At school, a 
>> teacher or fellow student is available to describe for them, but not at home.
>> This is unacceptable; I am paying the same as my neighbors, but am receiving 
>> much, much less for my money. Further, the tech folks at TWC haven't a clue 
>> what audio description is (ditto supervisors). 
>> Fully available? Not according to my dictionary or experience.
>> As pointed out previously, not everyone has modern equipment with a 
>> secondary audio channel, and many places choose a foregoing language feed 
>> rather than description, in the rare cases when the latter is in fact 
>> "legally available".
>> Christine
>> 
>> On Jan 21, 2013, at 11:06 AM, Devin Prater <d.pra...@me.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Well, the thing for me is, that if I can get the DVS on the TV, then fine, 
>>> wonderful. I'll surely use it sometimes. But what about when I'm at school, 
>>> and I want to watch something? I go to a blind school, so I stay in a dorm 
>>> all through the week. What do I do there? All the other kids watch 
>>> spungebob or whatever, so I just mainly stream my content, which up to now 
>>> has just been music and stuff, which I didn't really stream but rather just 
>>> got from iTunes. But now that I'm slightly interested in the whole TV 
>>> thing, what is there there? No one at the school knows about the whole FCC 
>>> thing, and I really don't think they'd go through the trouble of getting it 
>>> on there TVs. Must I pay for Serotek, when the sited get the same and much 
>>> more content when they want it? I know for a fact that Serotek doesn't have 
>>> all the star trek episodes that have been described. I am also curious as 
>>> to where they got the content they do have from. Would it be possible that 
>>> they have it illegally, and we are paying for an illegal service?
>>> On Jan 21, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Karen Lewellen <klewel...@shellworld.net> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> read your own posts Donna, particularly those about the value "to *us.*"
>>>> what *us* can you possibly mean?
>>>> Many in this thread have stated plainly that they have no problem 
>>>> whatsoever breaking any law they feel prevents them from having something 
>>>> they want, using and stealing protected content...by your dictionary then, 
>>>> they are  included in your "*us*."
>>>> My point has been that for *me* personally there is no relationship 
>>>> between comfort and stealing, the same can be achieved without the use of 
>>>> stolen property, and the same is already done over the airways.  The 
>>>> latter particularly is something the blindi-TV people are telling lies 
>>>> about in an effort to attract people to their site.
>>>> I documented for those who asked the existence daily of described content 
>>>> fully and legally available.  Reachable without violating any laws and if 
>>>> supported possibly matching even your idea of comfort depending on how you 
>>>> define comfort.
>>>> My point has been, and I have no issue whatsoever owning my opinions 
>>>> without the need to create an *us* around them is that the content is 
>>>> there.  support the content legally and there can be more of it, faster 
>>>> and easier.  Demonstrate that those  who have copyright concerns have a 
>>>> reason to fear, supporting  a service rooting its activity in lies for 
>>>> example, and you justify  the copyright holders concerns.
>>>> 
>>>> I cannot speak to your personal Morals Donna, I can say though that I 
>>>> respect your right to them. as long as you do not project them on to me by 
>>>> way of an association that does not exist between ahem *us* .  at all.  As 
>>>> long as you do not use them to justify violating the rights of others for 
>>>> the sake of your personal comfort...including me or anyone else in your 
>>>> definition of personal comfort.
>>>> I leave you to read your own posts and discover where that came from, and 
>>>> examine within yourself why it is so hard for *you* to own your  choices 
>>>> without needing to create an *us* to support them.
>>>> I know  firmly that nothing you say here applies to me already smiles.
>>>> The only thing we have in common is our humanity and the freedom to live 
>>>> differently that comes along with it.
>>>> You say, reduces the value for *us* not reduces the value for me 
>>>> personally.  If you cannot understand or choose not to understand the 
>>>> difference in that sentence...well.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, 21 Jan 2013, Donna Goodin wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Where the **** did that come from?
>>>>> 
>>>>> I haven't made a single generalization about how others should or should 
>>>>> not live, all that's come from you.  Or perhaps you don't consider 
>>>>> accusing others of stealing passing judgment?
>>>>> 
>>>>> FWIW, I find my life to be quite wonderful, and yes, at times "unique and 
>>>>> magical".  I just don't happen to believe that being comfortable 
>>>>> streaming online content makes me a moral degenerate.
>>>>> Donna
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Jan 21, 2013, at 8:49 AM, Karen Lewellen <klewel...@shellworld.net> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Donna,
>>>>>> Why are you so invested in reducing every persons experience of sight 
>>>>>> loss to your own?
>>>>>> I think you discover every day, if you so choose that is,  that how one 
>>>>>> lives with a situation is as unique and magical as they desire.
>>>>>> I personally have climbed no mountains, played golf tennis, or gone 
>>>>>> skiing lately...but I am not about to decide those who do this, and 
>>>>>> experience sight loss, are less independent because they do.
>>>>>> Perhaps you should examine for yourself what it is about other people 
>>>>>> doing things differently that bothers you so much?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Karen
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mon, 21 Jan 2013, Donna Goodin wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Karen,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Why are you so invested in insulting the rest of the world?  I think 
>>>>>>> that you've made your point quite clearly.  The fact that some of us 
>>>>>>> may not agree with you does not mean that we are all self-pitying, 
>>>>>>> unscrupulous, thieves.
>>>>>>> Donna
>>>>>>> On Jan 21, 2013, at 8:22 AM, Karen Lewellen <klewel...@shellworld.net> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> But it can.  even more independently than the reprehensible excuse for 
>>>>>>>> stealing that is blindi-TV.
>>>>>>>> Depending of course on how the individual in question experiences 
>>>>>>>> their blindness and writes their dictionary of independence.
>>>>>>>> Surely you do not think all  individuals with a sight loss diagnoses 
>>>>>>>> are exactly the same?  the definition alone makes that perspective 
>>>>>>>> impossible, limited,  and counter productive.
>>>>>>>> As a post I shared ages back expressed, all humans are dependent on 
>>>>>>>> each  other in one fashion or another.   This is more beneficial  to 
>>>>>>>> understand than creating false concepts of any experience that 
>>>>>>>> translate into exclusion.  especially based on someone Else's 
>>>>>>>> definition of independence.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> us who? lol!
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 21 Jan 2013, Donna Goodin wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> But, if that content cannot be independently accessed by a blind 
>>>>>>>>> individual, then it's value to us decreases significantly.
>>>>>>>>> Donna
>>>>>>>>> On Jan 20, 2013, at 10:47 PM, Karen Lewellen 
>>>>>>>>> <klewel...@shellworld.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> consider asking for a supervisor Alex,  it is a Holiday down there 
>>>>>>>>>> tomorrow smiles.
>>>>>>>>>> Still it is support that the claim regarding described content being 
>>>>>>>>>> virtually nonexistent made by the blinditv people  is very wrong.
>>>>>>>>>> I feel sure the list is older, it goes back to early October of last 
>>>>>>>>>> year.
>>>>>>>>>> the link from the aCB site which I can post too lists things by the 
>>>>>>>>>> day, but it is a google drive application.
>>>>>>>>>> I can share the link anyway though if there is interest .
>>>>>>>>>> Karen
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 20 Jan 2013, Alex Hall wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the lists. I'll have to call up Time Warner tomorrow and 
>>>>>>>>>>> see what they have to say regarding enabling described content, 
>>>>>>>>>>> then test it out Tuesday when Big Bang Theory is on (as that's the 
>>>>>>>>>>> only show on the list that interests me). Who knows, they might 
>>>>>>>>>>> have more content available now, though I doubt that the Syfy 
>>>>>>>>>>> channel makes it into the top tier.
>>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 20, 2013, at 11:35 PM, Karen Lewellen 
>>>>>>>>>>> <klewel...@shellworld.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Okay,
>>>>>>>>>>>> last one tonight.  a tiny bit of data and I do mean tiny.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> The 21st Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2010 reinstates the FCC's involvement in providing rules for
>>>>>>>>>>>> video description. Under the rules, affiliates in the top 25
>>>>>>>>>>>> markets and the top five-rated cable networks will have to
>>>>>>>>>>>> provide at least 50 hours of video described programming per
>>>>>>>>>>>> quarter, starting July 1, 2012.^[8]
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> this translates into at least 4 hours per week.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, this is only a swift listing and is slightly dated.
>>>>>>>>>>>> You will note that TBS  has big bang theory in reruns, given this
>>>>>>>>>>>> list was about 3 months into the rules it makes sense that CBS 
>>>>>>>>>>>> would be running them now too.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> ABC:
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Don't Trust the B---- in Apartment 23
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Extreme Makeover: Home Edition
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Happy Endings
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Last Man Standing
>>>>>>>>>>>> * The Middle
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Modern Family
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Nashville
>>>>>>>>>>>> * The Neighbors
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Secret Millionaire
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Shark Tank
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Suburgatory
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> CBS:
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Criminal Minds
>>>>>>>>>>>> * CSI: Crime Scene Investigation
>>>>>>>>>>>> * NCIS
>>>>>>>>>>>> * NCIS: Los Angeles
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Disney Channel:
>>>>>>>>>>>> * A.N.T. Farm
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Austin & Ally
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Doc McStuffins
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Dog With a Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fish Hooks
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Good Luck Charlie
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Gravity Falls
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Jake and the Never Land Pirates
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Jessie
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Little Einsteins
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Mickey Mouse Clubhouse
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Phineas and Ferb
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Shake It Up
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Fox:
>>>>>>>>>>>> * American Dad!
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Bob's Burgers
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Bones
>>>>>>>>>>>> * The Cleveland Show
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Family Guy
>>>>>>>>>>>> * The Following
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Glee
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Hell's Kitchen
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Hotel Hell
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Kitchen Nightmares
>>>>>>>>>>>> * MasterChef
>>>>>>>>>>>> * The Mindy Project
>>>>>>>>>>>> * New Girl
>>>>>>>>>>>> * The Simpsons
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> NBC:
>>>>>>>>>>>> * 30 Rock
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Animal Practice
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Betty White's Off Their Rockers
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Chicago Fire
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Community
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Deception
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Go On
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Grimm
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Guys with Kids
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Law & Order: Special Victims Unit
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Parenthood
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Saving Hope
>>>>>>>>>>>> * The Office
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Parks and Recreation
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Up All Night
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Whitney
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Nickelodeon:
>>>>>>>>>>>> * The Backyardigans
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Bubble Guppies
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Dora the Explorer
>>>>>>>>>>>> * The Fairly OddParents
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Go, Diego, Go!
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Max and Ruby
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Mike the Knight
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Ned's Declassified School Survival Guide
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Rugrats
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Splatalot!
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Team Umizoomi
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> TBS:
>>>>>>>>>>>> * The Big Bang Theory (reruns)
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Tyler Perry's For Better or Worse
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Tyler Perry's House of Payne
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> TNT:
>>>>>>>>>>>> * The Closer
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Law & Order (reruns)
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Turner Classic Movies:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Various films, listed on WGBH's DVS page on TCM
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> USA Network:
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Common Law
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Covert Affairs
>>>>>>>>>>>> * CSI: Crime Scene Investigation (reruns)
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Law & Order: Special Victims Unit (reruns)
>>>>>>>>>>>> * NCIS (reruns)
>>>>>>>>>>>> * NCIS: Los Angeles (reruns)
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Psych
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Royal Pains
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Suits
>>>>>>>>>>>> Again its dated, but see what I mean?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Karen
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 20 Jan 2013, Alex Hall wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> At the risk of being off-topic, could you provide us with some 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> popular shows that have audio description? Specifically, I enjoy 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Star Trek, Doctor Who, Star Gate (well, I would enjoy that one 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> were it described), and the CBS show The Big Bang Theory. To my 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> knowledge, none of these are ever described. If they are, I would 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> love to know about it. I can figure out how to enable the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> descriptions if indeed there are descriptions to be heard, but I 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't think these shows regularly air with any descriptions. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps my cable company (TWC) would know, but I have never had 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> much luck asking basic tech support about accessibility - they 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> never seem to know what I'm talking about. I do agree that blind 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> people cannot have it both ways, but exactly what are we supposed 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to do in the years it takes standard programming to become 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> accessible?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 20, 2013, at 8:52 PM, Karen Lewellen 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <klewel...@shellworld.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> depending on where you are, the source of your programming, your 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cable provider or satellites provider is required to make that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work for you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In fact you can file an FCC complaint now if they do not.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Additionally, efforts going on to make those menus work easily 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will not get much support if people are just going to circulate 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avenues  to stolen property.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And you wonder why the author's guild fears making books work?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What is keeping programs with audio descriptions from getting 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sponsorship the way captioning does?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The attitude that those getting the description do not deserve 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be treated like the rest of the consumer marketplace.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They can and will just steal it and circulate it as if this is 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> perfectly fine.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You cannot have it both ways, either you deserve a respected 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place at the audience market table regardless of how differently 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you view that table, or you deserve the stolen crumbs  from that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> table.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 20 Jan 2013, Devin Prater wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for that. If I can figure out how the menus on my TV 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work, I will certainly use what the FCC has provided.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 20, 2013, at 7:32 PM, Karen Lewellen 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <klewel...@shellworld.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you bet it really matters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And yes they do.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As of July 2012, all five broadcast networks and the same 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cable networks must provide audio described content, and they 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are doing i, every single week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all television stations in the top 25 markets stateside must 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> provide the content as well...with  additional markets  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> joining each year.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> why  should anyone invest in population who is simply going to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> steal property.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cable providers and satellites providers must insure that you 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can access the described content.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do not have the link to post now, but program listings and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> details are on the ACB website.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> frankly I find this exclusionary and distasteful.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consumers who happen to score differently on an eye chart, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must be segregated to stolen property on the Internet Never 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mind that Hollywood films and television shows air each week 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with  described content.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are you so lacking in personal dignity that you feel stolen 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> property is all you deserve?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Especially since the entire thing could be done legally?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is to some extent already.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No one is going to value you if you do not value yourselves, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> document that there is a market, use what the FCC is doing to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enhance the ability for everyone to enjoy television as they 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> choose.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karen
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 20 Jan 2013, Devin Prater wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hmm. Does it really matter? No one else seems to provide 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this, do they?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 20, 2013, at 7:03 PM, Karen Lewellen 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <klewel...@shellworld.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ahem,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they do have the legal right to run this service with this 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karen
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 20 Jan 2013, Kawal Gucukoglu wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are their any UK channels?  Do you think we could have an 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IOS App so that we can watch this service anywhere we go 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and we're not tied to the computer?  I like this service.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kawal.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 20 Jan 2013, at 07:51 PM, Devin Prater <d.pra...@me.com> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do like this service. Its pretty good, I can finally 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> watch sci-fi, and therefore can watch star trek! :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 20, 2013, at 12:49 PM, Matt Dierckens 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <matt.dierck...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have been given permission to post about this from 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> another list. This is a great service.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Check it out and please spread the word.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blindy.tv
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you ever wanted to watch TV with audio description 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but can't get the track on your tv? Well, now you 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can...sort of. Have a look at this.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.blindy.tv
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This project was created so that everyone could watch TV 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> episodes with audio description. Every show (except the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brain channel) has described content. You can switch 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> channels just like with an actual TV. So far,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their are 5 channels. Comedy, Drama, Si-fi, Brain and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ETC. More may be added if needed. Each show is either 30 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or 60 minutes long. After the show their are commercials 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (better than on TV, I can promise you that), a news 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> segment or comedy skit, and some instrumental music at 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the top and bottom of each hour.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To access this place, you can do one of two things: You 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can either go to the website linked above and used the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> web players, or, if you'd rather listen in your media 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> player of choice, place this link into it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This will load all channels, and you can use the next and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previous controls to move through the different channels.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://blindy.tv/all.m3u
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please give any suggestions or criticisms you have. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Feedback is always welcome. If you like the service, let 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us know. If you do not, tell us  what we could do to fix 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it up. Please spread the word if you like it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Enjoy!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my mac
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Twitter: matt692
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have a great day,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex (msg sent from Mac Mini)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mehg...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>>>>> macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Have a great day,
>>>>>>>>>>> Alex (msg sent from Mac Mini)
>>>>>>>>>>> mehg...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>>>>>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>>>> macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>>>>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>>>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

Reply via email to