On Mar 19, 2010, at 8:52 AM, Igor Stoppa wrote: > ext Ryan Abel wrote: > >> Well, except for the part where Nokia ends up marketing it as "MeeGo". Oh, >> and Harmattan's, apparently, MeeGo, too, and it definitely has closed stuff >> at the platform level. >> >> Yeah . . . not confusing at all. ;) > > No at all: it's about standardization. The device must support a certain set > of features and provide well defined APIs. > > So if a device is MeeGo compliant, it will be advertised as such. > > What's confusing about it?
Will it be advertised as such? Wording I've seen so far leads me to believe it'll be advertised as "MeeGo" not "MeeGo-compliant". I guess we'll have to wait and see. _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
