On Mar 19, 2010, at 5:50 PM, <igor.sto...@nokia.com> <igor.sto...@nokia.com> wrote:
> From: ext Ryan Abel [rabe...@gmail.com] > Sent: 19 March 2010 23:43 > >> Will it be advertised as such? Wording I've seen so far leads me to believe >> it'll be advertised as "MeeGo" not "MeeGo-compliant". I guess we'll have to >> wait and see. > > Anyway why wouldn't "MeeGo" be correct if it is contained in the device? I > could understand the argument if some MeeGo component was to be replaced, but > if it is extanded or if some gap (platform specific) is filled by a non-MeeGo > component, I see no real problem or miscommunication. Well, in Harmattans case, because it aint MeeGo at all. For anything else, well, I don't know. Until we know exactly how much of the platform is actually "MeeGo" it's impossible to say. But judging by the amount of differentiation I know Nokia likes to keep, it's going to be incredibly confusing to both users and developers. _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
