On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 3:18 PM Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop <mailop@mailop.org>
wrote:

> Dnia 17.01.2020 o godz. 09:49:31 Jay Hennigan via mailop pisze:
> >
> > It's not just Facebook. Lots of sites make you register with an
> > email address to see their content, even if you never intend to
> > interact with them by email. I use one of two methods.
> > Mailinator.com is a wonderful method, but many sites have blocked
> > them. Another is to create a freemail account solely for sites that
> > require email for registration but from which you never want to
> > receive mail. Fill out the form, log in to the account, laugh at all
> > the spam that is sitting there, reply to the registration request,
> > and never log in again until you need to register another such site.
>
> But that still means that the site sends mail to an existing address. Maybe
> one that you never log in to, but existing.
> And the topic was about Facebook sending mail to non-existent addresses.
>

I also have a FB account I didn't sign up for sending mail to one of my
test addresses.  No idea how long ago, but it looks like
at least at some point there was a way to do that.

I recovered the account and tried to delete it, don't recall how it went.
That address also receives a bunch of other mail
for this person who thinks it's their email address, like from their church
listserv.  No idea if they just don't know their address
or it's a common typo or misreading.  I just delete it and move on.

This type of thing is depressingly common for addresses that are common
names and such at the major providers.  One of the early folks at
RocketMail had d...@yahoo.com and it was nearly impossible to use because
of the amount of misdirected mail.  For Gmail's launch, we required
longer logins and banned something like the 5000 most common names we could
find and also prevented any simple homoglyphs, and still folks
end up in this state.  Detecting misdirected mail is a lot harder than
regular spam, if not impossible.  It's mostly one-off messages like
receipts where COI
isn't expected.  It'll also catch various manual lists that otherwise get
away without COI (ie, despite it being a best practice, if the complaint
rate is low enough because the number of addresses added is low enough and
they're usually the correct address and usually manual adds)... or it'll be
things like one to one messages like someone who gives their email address
to a car salesman when they do a test drive.

You can treat these all as spam, and as misdirected mail, they are.  The
problem is, they aren't usually of a volume that matters and using them to
block the source is likely to have more false positives than not.  Even on
a single user basis, knowing that one receipt from randomebiz.com is spam
and when that user actually buys something there it isn't... good luck.
Frankly, there aren't really any great solutions.  Luckily, most users
don't get much of this if any.

Brandon
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to