You bet wrong yet again. Who makes these statistics? Do you seriously
believe that someone impartial to the RIAA has actually come up with the
figures? The distribution of MP3's never even multiplied with a puff of
smoke, let alone explode to astronomical proportions as the "statisticians"
would like to consider it.
Adios,
LarZ
--------------- TAMA - The Strongest Name in Drums ---------------
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Of Dan Frakes
Sent: Friday, 28 July 2000 4:26
To: MDList
Subject: Re: MD: Napster
"Matthew Wall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>OK, here is a question for you all then, if the RIAA is soooo against
>napster, why havn't they tried to ban news servers? they have been around a
>H*ll of a lot longer than napster and i am 110% positive more copyrighted
>material has been downloaded from news servers than napster can even think
>of. just my 2 cents :)
If you're talking about the RIAA specifically, and downloaded music, I
think you're wrong about the amount of downloaded copyrighted material.
>From the statistics I've seen about Napster usage, I bet more music has
been downloaded via Napster this year alone than in newgroups in the past
twenty.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
