More fuel efficient I am sure.  They can save .01% fuel by going to a more expensive and complex system that will cost 8X as much in the long run but you save $3.92 a year in fuel and the EPA and EUCommies are happy you are not killing the planet as fast even though the life-cycle environmental costs of the new part is much worse than the old type.  Progress!

-_FT

On 7/25/22 7:39 PM, Kaleb Striplin via Mercedes wrote:
Yes exactly. I don’t really understand why they had to make it more complicated.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 25, 2022, at 6:37 PM, Jim Cathey<jim.cathey...@gmail.com>  wrote:

So, we change from a simple, easily diagnosed system with its most
failure-prone part being an external, non-pressurized bolt-on to one
with all of that internal, difficult to diagnose, and expensive to replace.

Progress!

The wretched X5 has that system, and of course it failed and needed
a new (rebuilt) compressor, with all the trimmings.

-- Jim


_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archiveshttp://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

--
--FT
_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

Reply via email to