Seriously, don't you know what distributive work means?

On 12/3/05, Alon Altman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

   Speak for yourself. *I* can't maintain 4 different sites. Unless you
volunteer to do so, don't speak for others.

YOU DON'T need to maintain those sites. Each club is in charge of his OWN site. You only have to *link* between them. You don't tell them what to do, at all!

   Building 4 sites means taking care of 4 clubs AND maintaining 4 sites,
instead of dealing with 4 clubs on one site.

No! You only have to see that the work is done, you don't do the work! You create one main site which is a *pointer* to the local clubs!

I agree. That's why we need ONE main site.

Which will link to each club's event (which has nothing to do with your work!). 


   My work is to teach students. Everything else is volunteering. I don't
have to take care of anything. I don't demand clubs to cooridnate with
eachother, but I do wish as an ideal that work be done only once, so we can
use the volunteer power elsewhere.

The work can be done once, by each club seperately. You can see the work as 1 unit. Each club is taking care of 1/4 unit, and your 1/4 unit is the simple syncing work and the main site (1 site for you).


   Is there any good reason to have 4 PR people each posting to the same
forums about 4 different series, and in the meanwhile confusing the audience
as to when and where these events will eventually take place?

There will be one PR person who will take care of the clubs. Each club will send his info to the main PR person.

   Why not build one site and let people from all clubs modify their parts
in it?

Because of all the reasons I mentioned, 3 times already.

Adir.

Reply via email to