On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Jon <jon.for...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
...SNIP...
>
But "interpreting" or "implying" or "inferring" is not useful. Explicit
> clarification
> from Kai and JonY as mingw-w64 leaders is needed. I suspect one reason why
> this hasn't
> happened is that both already have too much on their plate and don't want
> to set the
> expectation that either will be responsible for implementing and
> maintaining an official
> toolchain like JonY appears (aweome) to be doing at
> http://cygwin.mirrors.pair.com/release/gcc4/
> The old speak-up-and-get-stuck-with-it paradox ;)
>
>
Thoughts?
>
> Jon
>
Speak-up-and-get-stuck-with-it ;)
--
˙uʍop-ǝpısdn sı ɹoʇıuoɯ ɹnoʎ 'sıɥʇ pɐǝɹ uɐɔ noʎ ɟı
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
