At 01:06 15/10/1999 +0200, Stas Bekman wrote:
>The list already exist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] or this one
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (it's an alias right? was it also
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] ?)
Oh, that's good to know :-) Is it any/all of the above ? And if so, is it
running Majordomo or ezmlm (so that I can figure how to subscribe) ?
>BTW, if you remember that I've tried to create a new site about half a
>year ago (the first snapshot is still there at stason.org/stas/modperl)
>I've never made the second version :( It all went into
>modperl.sourcegarden.org's design...
Yes I remember, I would have helped back then (April) but I was way too
busy crossing the Atlantic and the amount of unconstructive criticism
unusual on this list probably didn't help get me more involved. Digging up
in the archives, I have found the link to the Site::Builder source
(http://www.singlesheaven.com/stas/modperl/src/builder.tar.gz , is it the
right one ?) which I am now downloading. As for the site, well it has a few
flaws but nothing worth flaming for and no project-killer. There are a few
things which I quite like, I think we'll list those when time comes to
actually design something.
Also, your input on what could be reused from your code would certainly be
helpful.
One funny thing, back then people referred to the Guide as the "miniguide" :-)
>Anyway, I've got about 40 emails with responds from people regarding the
>above first release. just a part of them in he archive, I can send the
>emails to you -- there are many good comments in there.
If you have anything that's not in the archives then I think those could
help, any good comments help.
>But while being flattered with having a Guide as part of the main menu,
>this is unfair to other folks who wrote an invaluable documentation
>(Vivek, Frank and other). While the Guide has integrated almost all of
>them inside itself, I vote for having a 'Documentation' entry in the
>main menu, with a sub menu, enlisting all the available documentation
>there. YMMV... Thanks!
Yes I totally agree. I had actually thought of that but I was just offering
a design idea and no real categorisation so I stopped before I started
looking for all available documentation. I meant neither offense nor praise
(though I think there is much praise to be said about the mod_perl
documentation as a whole, and making the "Books" entry plural was intentional).
.Robin
You can tune a piano, but you can't tuna fish.
